On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 18:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
> That, now that you mention it, could also effect this as I see it, my
> default kmail message body font is hack 14 in deference to the age of my
> eyes.
>
> My system default font is I believe utf-8. That is not a kmail settable
> option. But
On Sunday 07 January 2018 19:38:37 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > And here, unifont showed them as empty boxes. So does that point the
> > finger of guilt to kmail? This is the TDE, R14.0.5 version. Hundreds
> > of bugs fixed since the fork at KD
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> And here, unifont showed them as empty boxes. So does that point the
> finger of guilt to kmail? This is the TDE, R14.0.5 version. Hundreds of
> bugs fixed since the fork at KDE-3.5.
>
Huh. I've no idea, then, but it's entirely possible that
On Sunday 07 January 2018 19:04:12 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 January 2018 17:37:14 Random832 wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> > > 🐍 💻
> >> >
> >> > But here its broken and I am looking at two p
On Sunday 07 January 2018 19:04:12 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 January 2018 17:37:14 Random832 wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> > > 🐍 💻
> >> >
> >> > But here its broken and I am looking at two p
On 1/7/18 7:07 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2018 18:25:52 Random832 wrote:
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:47, Richard Damon wrote:
But it also says:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Which is incorrect, as the message is actually 8bit encoded (since
the Emoji aren't in the first 12
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2018 18:25:52 Random832 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:47, Richard Damon wrote:
>> > But it also says:
>> >
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> >
>> > Which is incorrect, as the message is actually 8bit encoded
On Sunday 07 January 2018 18:25:52 Random832 wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:47, Richard Damon wrote:
> > But it also says:
> >
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > Which is incorrect, as the message is actually 8bit encoded (since
> > the Emoji aren't in the first 127 characters, so th
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2018 17:37:14 Random832 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > > 🐍 💻
>> >
>> > But here its broken and I am looking at two pairs of vertical boxes
>> > because it is not properly mime'd. If you
On Sunday 07 January 2018 17:37:14 Random832 wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > 🐍 💻
> >
> > But here its broken and I am looking at two pairs of vertical boxes
> > because it is not properly mime'd. If you use chars or gliphs from a
> > non-default charset, it needs
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:47, Richard Damon wrote:
> But it also says:
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Which is incorrect, as the message is actually 8bit encoded (since the
> Emoji aren't in the first 127 characters, so their UTF-8 encoding isn't
> 7-bit. Some software might have mes
On 1/7/18 5:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2018 16:22:57 Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 05.01.18 um 22:15 schrieb Michael Torrie:
Please, no! We don't need emoji in this group. Fortunately the vast
majority of posters use plain text (as is the etiquette) and so we
don't have
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2018 16:22:57 Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>
>> Am 05.01.18 um 22:15 schrieb Michael Torrie:
>> > Please, no! We don't need emoji in this group. Fortunately the vast
>> > majority of posters use plain text (as is the etique
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > 🐍 💻
> >
> But here its broken and I am looking at two pairs of vertical boxes
> because it is not properly mime'd. If you use chars or gliphs from a
> non-default charset, it needs to demarcated with a mime-boundary marker
> followed by
On Sunday 07 January 2018 16:22:57 Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 05.01.18 um 22:15 schrieb Michael Torrie:
> > Please, no! We don't need emoji in this group. Fortunately the vast
> > majority of posters use plain text (as is the etiquette) and so we
> > don't have to worry about that kind of n
Am 05.01.18 um 22:15 schrieb Michael Torrie:
Please, no! We don't need emoji in this group. Fortunately the vast
majority of posters use plain text (as is the etiquette) and so we don't
have to worry about that kind of nonsense.
It's not needed, but shouldn't pose any big problems with modern
On 01/05/2018 10:56 AM, Kim of K. wrote:
> wow!
Yup that's what I said when I read your ramblings.
> even you are defensive about publishing non-working garbage.
Absolutely. You have absolutely no right to make demands of any of the
folks who toss their half-baked personal projects up on source
17 matches
Mail list logo
