On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Barry, Petr, any of the other folks working on distro level C extension
ports, perhaps one of you would be willing to consider an update to the C
extension porting guide to be more in line with Brett's latest version
On 2014-12-10, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel, I'm not sure about that: even if the code is 2- and 3-compatible
you'll pick one runtime.
Why do you say that?
I have both installed. I use both. Sometimes it depends on which
OS/distro I'm running, sometimes other reasons
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2014-12-10, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel, I'm not sure about that: even if the code is 2- and 3-compatible
you'll pick one runtime.
Why do you say that?
I have both installed. I use both.
On 13 Dec 2014 05:19, Petr Viktorin encu...@gmail.com wrote:
Also keep in mind that not all Python libraries are on PyPI.
For non-Python projects with Python bindings (think video players,
OpenCV, systemd, Samba), distribution via PyPI doesn't make much
sense. And since the Python bindings
So, I'm more than aware of how to write Python 2/3 compatible code. I've
ported 10-20 libraries to Python 3 and write Python 2/3 compatible code at
work. I'm also aware of how much writing 2/3 compatible code makes me hate
Python as a language. It'll be a happy day when one of the two languages
Also keep in mind that not all Python libraries are on PyPI.
For non-Python projects with Python bindings (think video players,
OpenCV, systemd, Samba), distribution via PyPI doesn't make much
sense. And since the Python bindings are usually second-class
citizens, the porting doesn't have a high
On 12/11/2014 09:48 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
A possible reason: one is developing an app expected to be released
fall 2015 after the 3.5 release and the app depends on something new
in 3.5. I must admit though that I cannot think of any such thing now
for 3.5. For 3.3 there was the new
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:07 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
If anyone is wondering why their favorite Linux distribution is stuck with
Python 2 – well, I can only speak for Fedora, but nowadays most of what's
left are CPython bindings. No pylint --py3k or 2to3 will help there...
It's true that some of
Remarks heard form updated.
Nathaniel, I'm not sure about that: even if the code is 2- and 3-compatible
you'll pick one runtime. 2 others questions now mention writing polyglot
code.
By the way I published the survey on HN, /r/programming /r/python:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8730156
I hesitated a while before deciding not to include it! Apart from python core
development what would be the reasons to work mostly on this version ?
I'll fix the omission right ahead.
—
Tagada tsouin tsouin
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Last year a survey was conducted on python 2 and 3 usage.
Here is the 2014 edition, slightly updated (from 9 to 11 questions).
It should not take you more than 1 minute to fill. I would be pleased if
you took
I disagree. I know there's a huge focus on The Big Libraries (and wholesale
migration is all but impossible without them), but the long tail of
libraries is still incredibly important. It's like saying that migrating
the top 10 Perl libraries to Perl 6 would allow people to completely ignore
all
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mark Roberts wiz...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. I know there's a huge focus on The Big Libraries (and wholesale
migration is all but impossible without them), but the long tail of
libraries is still incredibly important. It's like saying that migrating the
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 3:14:42 PM Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mark Roberts wiz...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. I know there's a huge focus on The Big Libraries (and
wholesale
migration is all but impossible without them), but the long tail of
2014-12-11 15:47 GMT+01:00 Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
I still think the only *real* obstacle remains the lack of important
packages such as twisted, gevent and pika which haven't been ported yet.
twisted core works on python 3, right now. Contribute to Twisted if
you want to port
On Dec 11, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I disagree. I know there's a huge focus on The Big Libraries (and wholesale
migration is all but impossible without them), but the long tail of
libraries is still incredibly important.
It is, but I think it's increasingly the case that packages
On 12/10/2014 5:04 PM, Bruno Cauet wrote:
I hesitated a while before deciding not to include it! Apart from python
core development what would be the reasons to work mostly on this version ?
where 'This version' == 3.5. A possible reason: one is developing an
app expected to be released fall
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Last year a survey was conducted on python 2 and 3 usage.
Here is the 2014 edition, slightly updated (from 9 to 11 questions).
It should not take you more than 1 minute to fill. I would be pleased if you
took
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Last year a survey was conducted on python 2 and 3 usage.
Here is the 2014 edition, slightly updated (from 9 to 11 questions).
It should not
On 10 Dec 2014 17:16, Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Last year a survey was conducted on python 2 and 3 usage.
Here is
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the url: http://goo.gl/forms/tDTcm8UzB3
I'll publish the results around the end of the year.
On Which versions do you use?, 3.5 is not included. My primary
Python 3 build on here is a 3.5 built from trunk. :)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Bruno Cauet brunoca...@gmail.com wrote:
I hesitated a while before deciding not to include it! Apart from python
core development what would be the reasons to work mostly on this version ?
I'll fix the omission right ahead.
My main reason is that I'm running
22 matches
Mail list logo
