[- Tue 5.Mar'13 at 2:42:07 + Steven D'Aprano :-]
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:09:10 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
But here's what I don't understand. Why does somebody who posts as
much as Steven (and thanks for that. Getting cussed at occasionally is a
cheap price for
On 05/03/2013 02:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
It's easy for him to
deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste I
toss over the fence, and his problem is solved.
Sounds like
On Tuesday 05 March 2013 06:54:14 Mark Lawrence did opine:
On 05/03/2013 02:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
It's easy for him to
deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste
Ignoring my own posting ban, since I've clearly been misunderstood ..
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:11:04 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
Do you consider it rude that you choose to use a newsreader, thus
Crap. I just forgot to do what I just said I would do and didn't go
through my inconvenient sequence.
Sorry, Steven. It was unintentional.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 03/04/2013 11:15 AM, David Robinow wrote:
Crap. I just forgot to do what I just said I would do and didn't go
through my inconvenient sequence.
Sorry, Steven. It was unintentional.
FWIW, you don't have to bother moving the python-list address to a To:
field. Just remove the personal
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:09:10 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
But here's what I don't understand. Why does somebody who posts as
much as Steven (and thanks for that. Getting cussed at occasionally is a
cheap price for all the free advice) not set up a simple mail filter
which trashes all mail
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
It's easy for him to
deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste I
toss over the fence, and his problem is solved.
Sounds like someone got Steven's goat.
*dives for cover*
On Monday 04 March 2013 23:00:31 Chris Angelico did opine:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
It's easy for him to
deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste I
toss over the fence, and his problem is
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 03:21:37 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:11:04 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
Do you consider it rude that you choose to use a newsreader, thus
inconveniencing those of us who use the mailing list, as God intended.
How the flying fuck does my choice
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:00:13 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
How the flying fuck does my choice of where and how *I* read this forum
inconvenience YOU?
Talk about an overactive sense of entitlement.
[- Sat 2.Mar'13 at 17:54:57 +1100 Chris Angelico :-]
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
No offence Chris, but you're the only person I know who *regularly*
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list.
What I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail
simply doesn't have that.
I've been replying to the poster and the list for ages. Is
On 02/03/2013 14:53, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list.
What I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail
simply doesn't have that.
I've been
On 03/02/2013 12:06 AM, James Griffin wrote:
[- Sat 2.Mar'13 at 17:54:57 +1100 Chris Angelico :-]
I also want to be able to change my mind as to whether it's
reply-all/reply-list/reply-sender after typing up a reply. Guess it's
time I grabbed Tbird to find out if it can do
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. What
I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail
simply doesn't have
In article 513298fa$0$30001$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. What
In article mailman.2806.1362276667.2939.python-l...@python.org,
David Robinow drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM,
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.2806.1362276667.2939.python-l...@python.org,
David Robinow drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM, David Robinow drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
There's a number of advantages to news vs. mail. The biggest is that
news spools generally keep a long history around, so it's easy to go
back and review a
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:42:50 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
In article 513298fa$0$30001$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:11:04 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, but
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM, David Robinow drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
There's a number of advantages to news vs. mail. The biggest is that
news spools
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:18 PM, David Robinow drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
But your mail has only what you receive. You have to hunt down a
separate archive of what was posted before you joined the thread.
Advantage goes to
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
How the flying fuck does my choice of where and how *I* read this forum
inconvenience YOU?
Talk about an overactive sense of entitlement. The world does not revolve
around you and I do not arrange my
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:55 AM, 김용빈 kyb...@gmail.com wrote:
why we bother with '{variable}'.format(variable=variable) ?
can we just '{variable}.format()' ?
if variable is exist, then assign it.
if variable is not exist, then raise error
I am not language expert. so sorry if this is not a
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:07:19 +1100, Chris Angelico replied to a thread of
Python-ideas:
You're asking for a facility whereby variables magically get pulled from
the caller's scope.
As interesting as that is, I think you sent it to the wrong list :)
Again.
O_o
No offence Chris, but you're
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:07:19 +1100, Chris Angelico replied to a thread of
Python-ideas:
You're asking for a facility whereby variables magically get pulled from
the caller's scope.
As interesting as
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
No offence Chris, but you're the only person I know who *regularly*
replies to the wrong list. Does your mail client not have a Reply to
List command, or Reply All? If so, then you should use it rather than
manually typing
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
No offence Chris, but you're the only person I know who *regularly*
replies to the wrong list. Does your mail client not have a Reply to
List
31 matches
Mail list logo
