2007/10/21, Robert Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/21/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I literally meant that the Python C API is object-oriented.
You don't need an object-oriented language to write object-oriented
code.
I disagree with this statement. C is not an object
On 10/22/07, Nicholas Bastin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Object-oriented programming is a design choice, not a language
feature. You can write straight procedural code in C++, and you can
write object oriented code in C. Sure, C++ has some language features
which facilitate object-oriented
This preference, in
turn, is what motivated my original question. The CPython API
interface itself seems modularized, NOT object oriented (only from
what I saw).
I suggest you look again, then. Things like PyObject_String,
PyObject_GetAttrString, or PySequence_GetItem all express the
Is there a C++ version of the C Python API packaged with python 2.5?
Stargaming has already mentioned the fine points; the first answer is:
yes, the API packaged python 2.5 can be used with C++. It is a C++
version of the same API as it adds proper extern C declarations around
all prototypes
On 10/21/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a C++ version of the C Python API packaged with python 2.5?
Stargaming has already mentioned the fine points; the first answer is:
yes, the API packaged python 2.5 can be used with C++. It is a C++
version of the same API
Well C++ implicitly includes OOP since that is the foundation of the
language. I was more or less asking if there was an object oriented
version of the Python embedded API or perhaps an OO wrapper. However
it doesn't seem that way, so I may have to make my own.
I think you are misinterpreting
On 10/21/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are misinterpreting what you are seeing. The Python C API
*is* object-oriented. It has all features of object-orientation:
classes, encapsulation, polymorphism, late binding, ...
As for make your own: people have tried this
Could you emphasize a little more? I haven't worked much at all with
the Python C API, so I may be misunderstanding. First of all, you say
that the Python C API is object oriented, which is contradictory
because it should read Python C++ API is object oriented. Perhaps
this is a typo, or
On 10/21/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I literally meant that the Python C API is object-oriented.
You don't need an object-oriented language to write object-oriented
code.
I disagree with this statement. C is not an object oriented language,
and I've seen attempts to make
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The most popular ones are Boost.Python, CXX, and PySTL.
I think SIP is also pretty popular (see
http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/sip/).
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:17:19 -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
On 10/21/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I literally meant that the Python C API is object-oriented. You
don't need an object-oriented language to write object-oriented code.
I disagree with this statement. C is not an
taking the time to respond to my inquiry and offer
a few C++ wrapper API's for the Python C API. Take care!
Any C++ version of the python API is by definition going to be a wrapper
around the C version. Even the C version is a wrapper around the python
object model.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Robert Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a C++ version of the C Python API packaged with python 2.5?
It would be nice to have a OOP approach to embedding python in C++. It
would also be a bonus if this C++ Python API cleaned up a lot of the
messy code involved
On 10/21/07, Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, a C++ API for CPython would necessarily be built on top of the C
API, which carries some limitations relative to the OOP abilities of C++
itself.
It wouldn't have to be, although it'd be much more of a maintenance
nightmare if it poked into
On 10/21/07, Robert Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I literally meant that the Python C API is object-oriented.
You don't need an object-oriented language to write object-oriented
code.
I disagree with this statement. C is not an
On 10/19/07, Robert Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a C++ version of the C Python API packaged with python 2.5?
It would be nice to have a OOP approach to embedding python in C++. It
would also be a bonus if this C++ Python API cleaned up a lot of the
messy code involved in embedding
Hi,
Is there a C++ version of the C Python API packaged with python 2.5?
It would be nice to have a OOP approach to embedding python in C++. It
would also be a bonus if this C++ Python API cleaned up a lot of the
messy code involved in embedding python.
Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:37:29 -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
Hi,
Is there a C++ version of the C Python API packaged with python 2.5? It
would be nice to have a OOP approach to embedding python in C++. It
would also be a bonus if this C++ Python API cleaned up a lot of the
messy code involved
18 matches
Mail list logo
