In article , gneun...@comcast.net
says...
>I don't think it's accurate to say that [some] experts really "scorn"
>newbies, but I do agree that newbies are occasionally mistreated.
>
>One thing newbies have to realize is that on Usenet you are quite
>likely to be talking to people who were there
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:10:16 +0200, francogrex
wrote:
>Unfortunately many so-called experts in the field look down
>on newbies and mistreat them (in any programming language forum),
>forgetting in the process that they were also at a certain time
>newbies until some gentle and nice enough teache
In article <16a7e301-2e85-47eb-971e-79acc4e07...@b35g2000yqi.
googlegroups.com>, gnuist...@gmail.com says...
>This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy
post
>that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that
no one
>need help me out. Then I was called "lazy" in
On 2010-07-15, bolega wrote:
> This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy post
> that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that no one
> need help me out. Then I was called "lazy" in one email and tersely
> given JUST the last name of an author who has many boo
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:17 PM, bolega wrote:
> This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy post
> that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that no one
> need help me out.
I have no record of such a post.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:17 PM, bolega wrote:
> On Jul 13, 11:18 pm, geremy condra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 PM, bolega wrote:
>> > On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman wrote:
>> >> Define Macro wrote:
>> >> > On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
>> >> >> I am trying to compare LIS
On Jul 13, 11:35 pm, Paul Rubin wrote:
> bolega writes:
> > I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness...
> > Are there already answers anywhere ?
> > How would a gury approach such a project ?
>
> These two articles
>
> http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~prechelt/Biblio/jccp
On Jul 13, 11:18 pm, geremy condra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 PM, bolega wrote:
> > On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman wrote:
> >> Define Macro wrote:
> >> > On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> >> >> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> >> >> For
bolega writes:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness...
> Are there already answers anywhere ?
> How would a gury approach such a project ?
These two articles
http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~prechelt/Biblio/jccpprt_computer2000.pdf
http://www.haskell.org/pape
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 PM, bolega wrote:
> On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman wrote:
>> Define Macro wrote:
>> > On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
>> >> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>>
>> >> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a
On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman wrote:
> Define Macro wrote:
> > On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> >> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> >> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> >> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> >> The c
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:39:45 +0200, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J.
Bourguignon) wrote:
>Nick Keighley writes:
>> Nick Keighley wrote:
>>> Rivka Miller wrote:
>>
Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
>>>
>>> Laurence according to wikipedia (search time 2s)
>>
On 14 June, 00:07, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there alr
Nick Keighley writes:
> On 8 July, 08:08, Nick Keighley
> wrote:
>> On 7 July, 17:38, Rivka Miller wrote:
>
>
>> > Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
>>
>> Laurence according to wikipedia (search time 2s)
>
> oops! He was born Laurence but changed it legally to "
On 8 July, 08:08, Nick Keighley
wrote:
> On 7 July, 17:38, Rivka Miller wrote:
> > Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
>
> Laurence according to wikipedia (search time 2s)
oops! He was born Laurence but changed it legally to "L." including
the dot
--
http://mail
On 7 July, 17:38, Rivka Miller wrote:
> Although C comes with a regex library,
C does not come with a regexp library
> Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
Laurence according to wikipedia (search time 2s)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 20 June, 03:48, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> nanothermite911fbibustards
> writes:
>
> Asking whether Lisp is faster than C is like asking why it's
> colder in the mountains than it is in the summer.
original Karl Valentin would be
but yours is in his sense.
Wolfgang
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
On Jun 13, 4:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there al
On Jun 14, 1:07 am, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there al
Tim Rentsch wrote:
> nanothermite911fbibustards
>
> > How to make Lisp go faster than C
> > Didier Verna
>
> Asking whether Lisp is faster than C is like asking why it's
> colder in the mountains than it is in the summer.
YM warmer.
HTH; HAND.
Richard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/list
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there al
nanothermite911fbibustards
writes:
>> Probably doesn't meet your intent, but this is a really impressive bit
>> of (whacky) art:
>
> Lisp runs faster than C. Once you get more time away from screwing
> Palestinians, and other false-flags, you will find ideas like these
>
> How to make Lisp go fas
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there al
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:07 PM, bolega wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
Scheme is actually a lisp, isn't it ?
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size a
In article ,
bolega wrote:
>I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
>For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
>writes C interpreter in C.
>
>The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
>Are there already answe
> Probably doesn't meet your intent, but this is a really impressive bit
> of (whacky) art:
Lisp runs faster than C. Once you get more time away from screwing
Palestinians, and other false-flags, you will find ideas like these
How to make Lisp go faster than C
Didier Verna
Abstract
Contrary to po
On Jun 13, 4:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there al
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
>
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
>
> The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
>
> Are there al
On 2010-06-13 16:07:54 -0700, bolega said:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
Are there alr
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:07 PM, bolega wrote:
> I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
Try the programming languages shootout.
> For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
> writes C interpreter in C.
Good luck.
> The criteria would be t
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
Are there already answers anywhere ?
How would a gury appro
31 matches
Mail list logo
