[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recent Pystone Benchmark message says that Python is only 75% as
fast on Linux as on Windows.
no, it really only says that the Pystone benchmark is 75% as fast as Linux as on
Windows, on the poster's hardware, using his configuration, and using different
compilers.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Tobis wrote:
(unwisely taking the bait...)
If you like your language to look like this
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~szymansk/OOF90/bugs.html
then more power to you.
Thanks for pointing out that interesting article on Fortran 90 bugs.
How long would a
Alex Martelli wrote:
snip
For scientific computation, consider the case of Numeric
and Numarray. I don't think Numeric binaries are available for
Python
2.4,
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jdbrandm/Numeric-23.6.win32-py2.4.exe ? Just
googled and visited the first hit -- I don't currently use
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alex Martelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
You're saying that using a different and better compiler cannot speed
the execution of your Fortran program by 25% when you move it from one
platform to another...?! This seems totally absurd to me, and yet I see
no other way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had in mind the Polyhedron Fortran 90 benchmarks for Windows and
Linux on Intel x86 at
http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/compare/linux/f90bench_p4.html and
http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/compare/win32/f90bench_p4.html . The speed
differences of Absoft, Intel, and Lahey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Tobis wrote:
(unwisely taking the bait...)
If you like your language to look like this
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~szymansk/OOF90/bugs.html
then more power to you.
Thanks for pointing out that interesting article on Fortran 90 bugs.
How long would a
On 30 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sparring
with Alex Martelli is like boxing Mike Tyson, except that one
experiences brain enhancement rather than brain damage :).
+1 QOTW
:-)
Michael.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Michael Tobis wrote:
Fortran programmers are generally happy with the portability of the
language.
Until they try to port something...? Honestly, I can't imagine where
anyone would get this impression.
From the fact that Fortran has been used on hundreds of platforms and
that many
Michael Tobis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Tobis wrote:
Fortran 90/95 is more expressive than Fortran 77 in many ways, as
described in ...
http://www.nr.com/CiP97.pdf .
... expresses more science per
line of code and per programming workday.
The example shown on p 10
Thought some folks here might find this one interesting. No great revelations,
just a fairly sensible piece on writing readable code :)
The whole article:
http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentpa=showpagepid=271page=1
The section specifically on white space:
Thanx Nick
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Thought some folks here might find this one interesting. No great
revelations,
just a fairly sensible piece on writing readable code :)
The whole article:
http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentpa=showpagepid=271page=1
The section specifically on white space:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
.
.
One ought to do a little research before publishing an article.
Apparently, many authors and editors are too lazy to do so.
... and/or ignorant or uncultured.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The suggestions in the cited article, How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any
Language, are reasonable but elementary and can be followed in Fortran
90/95/2003 as well as any other language. What infuriates me is that
the author writes as if Fortran has not evolved since the
(unwisely taking the bait...)
If you like your language to look like this
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~szymansk/OOF90/bugs.html
then more power to you.
I prefer my languages to be portable, terse and expressive. That's why
I like Python. If you want your language to be obscure, ill-defined and
Michael Tobis wrote:
(unwisely taking the bait...)
If you like your language to look like this
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~szymansk/OOF90/bugs.html
then more power to you.
Thanks for pointing out that interesting article on Fortran 90 bugs.
How long would a comparable C++ list be? Even Python has
16 matches
Mail list logo