On Feb 5, 11:42 pm, "John Machin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 1:19 pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I tried to open the file with Kate, trust me, it's an Excel file.
>
> Who or what is Kate? In what sense is trying to open it any evidence
> that it's an Excel file? Did you *
En Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:31:30 -0300, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> On Feb 6, 10:46 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd try the "xlrd" package - it is capable of reading Excel files on any
>> platform.
>
> Thanks for the plug, Gabriel. However xlrd is not the pa
On Feb 6, 1:19 pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to open the file with Kate, trust me, it's an Excel file.
Who or what is Kate? In what sense is trying to open it any evidence
that it's an Excel file? Did you *succeed* in opening the file "with
Kate"?
What is the problem that the
I tried to open the file with Kate, trust me, it's an Excel file.
I'm using xlrd, it works beautifully (although come to think of it, I
haven't tried writing to an .xls file yet... hmmm)
> To clear up the doubts, I'd suggest that the OP do something like this
> at the Python interactive prompt:
>
On Feb 6, 12:27 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 5:46 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > En Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:52:10 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > > On Feb 3, 1:43?pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Feb 6, 10:46 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:52:10 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > On Feb 3, 1:43?pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> >> .xls
On Feb 5, 5:46 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:52:10 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > On Feb 3, 1:43?pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> >> .xls
En Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:52:10 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Feb 3, 1:43?pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
>> .xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid to write
>> files the
On 5 Feb., 10:53, greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. But does this mean that "duplicating" is
> actually from the wrong root?
by definition: roots are never wrong ;)
But indeed, you're right, one has to look at the root (eg connected
verb) to understand the Numeralia they used:
The nu
Arnd wrote:
> Good observation, but as we have numbers of type Cardinalia,
> Ordinalia, Distributiva & Multiplicativa in Latin I would prefer
> secundating or secondating. (Bisimating or bicimating would multiply
> the lines by a factor 2)
Interesting. But does this mean that "duplicating" is
act
Excellent suggestion. I'm going with xlrd! Thanks
> I've had good luck with xlrd. It does not require using COM, Excel, or even
> Windows!
> http://www.lexicon.net/sjmachin/xlrd.htm
> Robert Kern
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> Every other line would be bicimating or something,
> wouldn't it?
Good observation, but as we have numbers of type Cardinalia,
Ordinalia, Distributiva & Multiplicativa in Latin I would prefer
secundating or secondating. (Bisimating or bicimating would multiply
the lines by a factor 2)
;) Arnd
Hi,
> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> ..xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid to write
> files the average user can read.
>
> I'd like some advice on how to go about:
> 1. Reading a large Excel file and chop it into many Excel files (with
>
gonzlobo wrote:
> No, I don't want to destroy them (funny how the word 'decimate' has
> changed definition over the years) :).
>
> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> .xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid to write
> files the average user can r
On Feb 3, 7:43 pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I don't want to destroy them (funny how the word 'decimate' has
> changed definition over the years) :).
>
> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> .xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid t
Yeah, it definitely an Excel file (so says Kate).
> Is the file format really native Excel, or is a CSV or TSV file? I've
> seen apps (one is a data acquisition program, as a matter of fact)
> that create "Excel" files that are just CSV or TSV files. Try opening
> the file with a text editor to se
gonzlobo wrote:
> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> .xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid to write
> files the average user can read.
>
> I'd like some advice on how to go about:
> 1. Reading a large Excel file and chop it into many Excel fil
gonzlobo wrote:
> 2. Decimate an Excel file & write... say every other line (user
> selectable)... to a new file.
Every other line would be bicimating or something,
wouldn't it?
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks, but I was looking for a python solution.
> Excel has VBA and can do this easily. One thing about
> Excel's VBA is that it already understands Excel.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 3, 1:43?pm, gonzlobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I don't want to destroy them (funny how the word 'decimate' has
> changed definition over the years) :).
>
> We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
> .xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid t
No, I don't want to destroy them (funny how the word 'decimate' has
changed definition over the years) :).
We have a data acquisition program that saves its output to Excel's
.xls format. Unfortunately, the programmer was too stupid to write
files the average user can read.
I'd like some advice o
21 matches
Mail list logo
