Fredrik Lundh wrote:
no, but that's because you're the kind of pathetic loser who only sees
problem with things, and only pops up when you have a chance to piss
on something.
Are you going to address the issue, or just limit
yourself to a public temper tantrum?
--
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what issue? your inability to contribute anything but complaints? that's
your problem, and you have to fix that yourself. I'm sure you'd feel better
if you tried.
I'm not sure what's wrong with complaints. I've submitted a lot of
bug reports and they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, but that's because you're the kind of pathetic loser who only sees
problem with things, and only pops up when you have a chance to piss
on something.
Are you going to address the issue, or just limit
yourself to a public temper tantrum?
what issue? your
Ed Singleton wrote:
I'm not much of an expert in anything yet, but I had an idea, and then
managed to put the documents in a wiki, which was at least trying to
do something. Fredrik beat me to it and did a much better job, but
even so I feel quite proud that I did something and tried to move
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
I'm not much of an expert in anything yet, but I had an idea, and then
managed to put the documents in a wiki, which was at least trying to
do something. Fredrik beat me to it and did a much better job, but
even so I feel quite proud that I did something and tried
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and for the record: the infogami setup had never happened if Ed hadn't
written that post.
I wouldn't rest on my laurels quite yet if I were you.
You've provided a good piece to take care of the input
collection side of the equasion but I've seen nothing
that
1) dear lazyweb/lazynet: does anyone have some time to spare on figuring
out how to log into infogami from a simple python script. standard library
only, preferrably.
nevermind. the hack that didn't work yesterday did did work today. must
have been a bad cookie day.
/F
--
On 30 Mar 2006 16:30:24 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
write a tutorial as good as what is already there. But what I can
do is report problems I find when using it, and make suggestions
about how to avoid those problems.
Ed == Ed Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Go to the wiki, make the changes you want, and feel good about
Ed yourself for once.
+1 QOTW.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ed Singleton wrote:
On 30 Mar 2006 16:30:24 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you saying? Ideas must come only from those
with the time and skill to implement them? No one else
need apply?
Ideas can come from anyone and they do come from anyone all the time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed == Ed Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Go to the wiki, make the changes you want, and feel good about
Ed yourself for once.
+1 QOTW.
I suggest leaving off the for once. Otherwise, it is just
another gratuitous insult, of the kind there is already
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed Singleton wrote:
Ideas can come from anyone and they do come from anyone all the time,
and as such they are fairly worthless unless acted upon.
That is pretty obvious. The question is about who does
the acting. Your position seems to be that
only those that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and probably for no thanks),
Do you think you know me well enough from a
handful of usenet postings to conclude that?
yes. anyone who's been involved with open source project long
enough has seen enough people like you to know you. you're not
unique, in any way.
Ed Singleton wrote:
I'd suggest adding some sort of guidance page so that people know
roughly what's expected. IE can they just add questions and comments
into the text, hoping that someone more knowledgeable will sort it out
(or delete it).
I've added some notes to the front-page. feel
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Ed Singleton wrote:
I'd suggest adding some sort of guidance page so that people know
roughly what's expected. IE can they just add questions and comments
into the text, hoping that someone more knowledgeable will sort it out
(or delete it).
I've added some notes
Gerard Flanagan wrote:
I've added some notes to the front-page. feel free to tweak/clarify (or
post
comments here or on the site).
for now, I think it's worth trying to keep the text clean and reasonably
read-
able at all times, and use the comment function to add
Terry Reedy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
But the perception I get here, from responses like yours,
is that such suggestions are unwelcome, and unlikely
to be acted upon.
FL is not the main doc maintainer. Even if you were to be
Terry Reedy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
But the perception I get here, from responses like yours,
is that such suggestions are unwelcome, and unlikely
to be acted upon.
FL is not the main doc maintainer. Even if you were to be
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP points out an ambiguity in the docs, and as usual,
gets told he can't read, etc. How typical.
where did anyone tell the OP that he can't read?
it could be that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the time you've spent posting about this, you or someone
else with svn access to the docs, could have simply gone
and made the change. Admittedly most changes would
require more process but there are many like this just require
someone to DO IT. Give me svn
On 29/03/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
write a tutorial as good as what is already there. But what I can
do is report problems I find when using it, and make suggestions
about how to avoid those problems.
There's no shortage of ideas -- nor people who
Ed Singleton wrote:
This would be a perfect situation for a wiki. I think it would be a
good experiment to have a wiki containing the documentation (separate
from the main documentation and clearly marked experimental for the
moment), and to see if it did self-organise as wikis often do.
(I'm actually tempted to just copy and paste each page from the
tutorial into the current wiki but I'd hate for it all to be deleted
after doing that).
just do it!
btw, one alternative could be to use an infogame site for this purpose:
http://infogami.com
this gives you revision
btw, one alternative could be to use an infogame site for this purpose:
http://infogami.com
this gives you revision history, a permissions system (limiting editing to
registered users might be a good idea), comments, an associated blog,
voting, feeds, change logs, etc.
alright, I got
On 29/03/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, one alternative could be to use an infogame site for this purpose:
http://infogami.com
this gives you revision history, a permissions system (limiting editing to
registered users might be a good idea), comments, an associated
On 29/03/06, Ed Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/03/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, one alternative could be to use an infogame site for this purpose:
http://infogami.com
this gives you revision history, a permissions system (limiting editing to
Ed Singleton wrote:
alright, I got bored and uploaded a copy of the current Python tutorial to
http://pytut.infogami.com
Damn. You beat me to it by an hour.
http://singletoned.infogami.com/_special/index
oops. sorry for that.
I had a nightmare with character encodings (mainly
On 29/03/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed Singleton wrote:
alright, I got bored and uploaded a copy of the current Python tutorial to
http://pytut.infogami.com
Damn. You beat me to it by an hour.
http://singletoned.infogami.com/_special/index
oops. sorry for
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP points out an ambiguity in the docs, and as usual,
gets told he can't read, etc. How typical.
where did anyone tell the OP that he can't read?
it could be that the tutorial author expected you
to read chapter 8 before you read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where did anyone tell the OP that he can't read?
it could be that the tutorial author expected you
to read chapter 8 before you read chapter 9,...
This actually acknowledges an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP points out an ambiguity in the docs, and as usual,
gets told he can't read, etc. How typical.
where did anyone tell the OP that he can't read?
it could be that the tutorial author expected you
to
31 matches
Mail list logo
