Paul McNett wrote:
> > Whatever is preferred, what's the upside/downsides of the two beyond
> > what I just explained?
>
> Nothing really, but something handy to keep in mind is that the string
> literal ("""x""") can be used to block out huge sections of code during
> testing, where you'd have to
Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen wrote:
> So, my question is, is there a way to get __doc__ support for
> properties, in effect, use the """xxx""" syntax for documenting properties.
Yes, the property() function accepts a doc argument, as in:
property(fget, fset, fd
then classname.close.__doc__ shows the text.
So, my question is, is there a way to get __doc__ support for
properties, in effect, use the """xxx""" syntax for documenting properties.
Is the preferred way to use """xxx""" or # to doc
