On Monday 8 Jun 2015 07:04 CEST, Johannes Bauer wrote:
On 07.06.2015 22:35, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
And you also posted your solution. I fail to find any question in
your original posting at all.
That is because there was no question: I just wanted to share
something I thought that could
On 07.06.2015 10:22, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both the
needed time AND the output.
And you also posted your solution. I fail to find any question in your
original posting at all.
Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 11:06 CEST, Luca Menegotto wrote:
Il 07/06/2015 10:22, Cecil Westerhof ha scritto:
That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both
the needed time AND the output.
Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going down
First of all, thank God
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 20:51 CEST, Johannes Bauer wrote:
On 07.06.2015 10:22, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both
the needed time AND the output.
And you also posted your solution. I fail to find any question in
your original posting at
On 07/06/2015 12:02, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
Get your cheque book and go for paid support.
Are checks still in use in Britain? I thought only Americans still did
that.
Marko
Cheques are still in use in Britain. There was a move a year or so ago
to
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 08:16 pm, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I suggest that you stop asking so many question here. Get your cheque
book and go for paid support.
Mark, that remark is uncalled for and completely out of line. Cecil is
perfectly entitled to ask questions here, and you are entitled to
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 12:16 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I suggest that you stop asking so many question here. Get your
cheque book and go for paid support.
First of all: it was not a question: I shared something I thought was
useful. You can disagree about it being useful, but there is in my
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:39 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but at
the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I wrote
the following function:
def time_test(function, *args):
startTime = time.time()
In a message of Sun, 07 Jun 2015 11:16:30 +0100, Mark Lawrence writes:
I suggest that you stop asking so many question here. Get your cheque
book and go for paid support.
Knock this off, please. Some of us dearly like to teach
people who want to explore and learn things.
Laura
--
On 07/06/2015 11:16, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/06/2015 09:22, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both the
needed time AND the output.
Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going down. Here I
get an alternative that does only half what
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
Get your cheque book and go for paid support.
Are checks still in use in Britain? I thought only Americans still did
that.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 11:28 CEST, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:39 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but
at the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I
wrote the following function: def
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 13:05 CEST, Tim Golden wrote:
On 07/06/2015 11:16, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/06/2015 09:22, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both
the needed time AND the output.
Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 11:28 CEST, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Here is a simple example:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577896-benchmark-code-with-the-with-statement/
I use that now in my function:
#---
def time_test(function,
On 07/06/2015 09:22, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 09:39 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/06/2015 07:39, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but
at the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I
wrote the
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 11:51 CEST, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:39 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but
at the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I
wrote the following function: def
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 08:39 CEST, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but at
the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I
wrote the following function: def time_test(function, *args):
startTime = time.time() results =
On 07.06.2015 22:35, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
And you also posted your solution. I fail to find any question in
your original posting at all.
That is because there was no question: I just wanted to share
something I thought that could be useful. If you would have taken the
trouble to read a
On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 09:39 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/06/2015 07:39, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but
at the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I
wrote the following function: def time_test(function,
Il 07/06/2015 10:22, Cecil Westerhof ha scritto:
That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both the
needed time AND the output.
Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going down
First of all, thank God it's a newsgroup, not a list.
Second, often the quality
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:39 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but at
the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I wrote
the following function:
def time_test(function, *args):
startTime = time.time()
Il 07/06/2015 11:28, Steven D'Aprano ha scritto:
But if your function takes less than, say, 1 millisecond, then your timing
results are probably just meaningless random numbers, affected more by the
other ten thousand processes running on your computer than by the Python
code itself.
That's
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but at
the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I wrote
the following function:
def time_test(function, *args):
startTime = time.time()
results = function(*args)
endTime =
On 07/06/2015 07:39, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Sometimes I just want to know how much time a function takes, but at
the same time I also want the result of the function. For this I wrote
the following function:
def time_test(function, *args):
startTime = time.time()
results
24 matches
Mail list logo
