On Aug 11, 6:06 pm, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens Thiede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't like the property function, usable in the new-style classes,
> > because having to remember to manage a list of "foo = property(...)"
> > assignments just plain sucks, so I wrote a metac
On Aug 11, 7:33 am, Jens Thiede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't like the property function, usable in the new-style classes,
> because having to remember to manage a list of "foo = property(...)"
> assignments just plain sucks, so I wrote a metaclass that does things
> a little differently. Pl
Jens Thiede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't like the property function, usable in the new-style classes,
> because having to remember to manage a list of "foo = property(...)"
> assignments just plain sucks, so I wrote a metaclass that does things
> a little differently. Please have a look an
I don't like the property function, usable in the new-style classes,
because having to remember to manage a list of "foo = property(...)"
assignments just plain sucks, so I wrote a metaclass that does things
a little differently. Please have a look and tell me whether this is
useful or impractical.
