On 21 Lut, 21:27, "Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other candidates besides
> PLY:http://www.nedbatchelder.com/text/python-parsers.htmlhttp://wiki.python.org/moin/LanguageParsing
>
> I'm not sure this is a "one size fits all" problem space.
>
> Personally I find PLY's use of docstrings
On Feb 21, 7:02 am, "Jakub Stolarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 20 Lut, 19:29, "Alan Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> If not, what
> module providing substantially similar functionality is?
>
> AFAIK there's no parser generator module in standard library.
>
> I would like to see PLY in sta
On 20 Lut, 19:29, "Alan Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If not, what module providing substantially similar functionality is?
>
AFAIK there's no parser generator module in standard library.
I would like to see PLY in standard library too.
--
Jakub Stolarski
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
On Feb 20, 6:29 pm, "Alan Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is PLY destined for the standard library?
I've never heard it suggested... but +1
Fuzzyman
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/articles.shtml
> If not, what module providing substantially similar functionality is?
>
> Thank you,
> Alan
Is PLY destined for the standard library?
If not, what module providing substantially similar functionality is?
Thank you,
Alan Isaac
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list