Re: PLY for standard library

2007-02-22 Thread Jakub Stolarski
On 21 Lut, 21:27, "Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other candidates besides > PLY:http://www.nedbatchelder.com/text/python-parsers.htmlhttp://wiki.python.org/moin/LanguageParsing > > I'm not sure this is a "one size fits all" problem space. > > Personally I find PLY's use of docstrings

Re: PLY for standard library

2007-02-21 Thread Paul McGuire
On Feb 21, 7:02 am, "Jakub Stolarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20 Lut, 19:29, "Alan Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> If not, what > module providing substantially similar functionality is? > > AFAIK there's no parser generator module in standard library. > > I would like to see PLY in sta

Re: PLY for standard library

2007-02-21 Thread Jakub Stolarski
On 20 Lut, 19:29, "Alan Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If not, what module providing substantially similar functionality is? > AFAIK there's no parser generator module in standard library. I would like to see PLY in standard library too. -- Jakub Stolarski -- http://mail.python.org/mailman

Re: PLY for standard library

2007-02-20 Thread Fuzzyman
On Feb 20, 6:29 pm, "Alan Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is PLY destined for the standard library? I've never heard it suggested... but +1 Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/articles.shtml > If not, what module providing substantially similar functionality is? > > Thank you, > Alan

PLY for standard library

2007-02-20 Thread Alan Isaac
Is PLY destined for the standard library? If not, what module providing substantially similar functionality is? Thank you, Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list