On 1/10/14 2:43 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 9:48:43 AM UTC-8, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Python-Dev, Dan Stromberg posted this link with the results:
http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/python-2.x-vs-3.x-survey/
That link gave me a 404. :^(
Sorry, it worked when
On 2014-01-10 19:43, John Ladasky wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 9:48:43 AM UTC-8, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Python-Dev, Dan Stromberg posted this link with the results:
http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/python-2.x-vs-3.x-survey/
That link gave me a 404. :^(
It's available here:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 9:48:43 AM UTC-8, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Python-Dev, Dan Stromberg posted this link with the results:
>
> http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/python-2.x-vs-3.x-survey/
That link gave me a 404. :^(
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 01/10/2014 09:36 AM, John Ladasky wrote:
We have to remember to convert between the remote device's
expectation of strings of bytes, and Python's expectation of
strings of Unicode characters. When we forget, there can be
bugs. I'm sure that I'll get used to it eventually.
A useful data po
On 1/10/14 12:36 PM, John Ladasky wrote:
I responded to the survey about a week ago. Dan, I hope you will share the
results with us soon. I also tried to reply to this thread, but I lost the
ability to post to newsgroups for about a week. It seems to have been
restored, so I will try again.
I responded to the survey about a week ago. Dan, I hope you will share the
results with us soon. I also tried to reply to this thread, but I lost the
ability to post to newsgroups for about a week. It seems to have been
restored, so I will try again.
My transition from Py2 to Py3 is implicit
On 01/02/2014 08:55 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-12-31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You laugh, but there was at least one attendee at the last PyCon who was
still using 1.5 professionally. Software never quite dies so long as there
is hardware capable of running it.
ITYM: ... so long as ther
On 2013-12-31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>> On 30/12/2013 21:56, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
>>>
>>> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
>>> Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
>>>
>>> I'd be very
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:07:54 +1100, David wrote:
>On 1 January 2014 23:38, Steve Hayes wrote:
>>
>> I was thinking or of this:
>>
> python g:\work\module1.py
>> File "", line 1
>> python g:\work\module1.py
>>^
>>
>> Which gave a different error the previous time I did it.
>>
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:38:59 +0200, Steve Hayes
wrote:
>>> python g:\work\module1.py
File "", line 1
python g:\work\module1.py
^
Which gave a different error the previous time I did it.
But, hey, it worked from the DOS prompt
C:\Python32>python g:\work\module1.py
Hel
On 1 January 2014 23:38, Steve Hayes wrote:
>
> I was thinking or of this:
>
python g:\work\module1.py
> File "", line 1
> python g:\work\module1.py
>^
>
> Which gave a different error the previous time I did it.
>
> But, hey, it worked from the DOS prompt
>
> C:\Python32>py
On 01/01/2014 12:38, Steve Hayes wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 22:37:45 +1100, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
Steve Hayes wrote:
I borrowed a book called "Learning Python" by Lutz and Asher, which is
geared for 2.2/2.3.
But the version I have in Windows is 3.2, and it seems that even "Hello
World" pre
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
> I was thinking or of this:
>
python g:\work\module1.py
> File "", line 1
> python g:\work\module1.py
>^
>
> Which gave a different error the previous time I did it.
>
> But, hey, it worked from the DOS prompt
>
> C:\Pytho
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 22:37:45 +1100, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>Steve Hayes wrote:
>
>> I borrowed a book called "Learning Python" by Lutz and Asher, which is
>> geared for 2.2/2.3.
>>
>> But the version I have in Windows is 3.2, and it seems that even "Hello
>> World" presents and insurmountable pr
Steve Hayes wrote:
> I borrowed a book called "Learning Python" by Lutz and Asher, which is
> geared for 2.2/2.3.
>
> But the version I have in Windows is 3.2, and it seems that even "Hello
> World" presents and insurmountable problem.
It certainly is not *insurmountable*. Not unless you conside
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
> I borrowed a book called "Learning Python" by Lutz and Asher, which is geared
> for 2.2/2.3.
That's really REALLY old. Even Red Hat isn't still supporting 2.2. You
can quite easily get started on 3.2 on Windows - though I would
recommend grabbi
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:56:30 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
>
>Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
>Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
>
>I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out.
I had a
In article <52c29782$0$29979$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> > On 30/12/2013 21:56, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> >> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
> >>
> >> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 30/12/2013 21:56, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
>>
>> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
>> Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
>>
>> I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill
On 30/12/2013 21:56, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out.
Here's the URL:
https://www.
On 30Dec2013 19:16, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 16:14:53 -0600, Andrew Berg
> declaimed the following:
>
> >On 2013.12.30 15:56, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> >> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
> >>
> >> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put togeth
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
>
> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
> Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
>
> I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out.
>
> Here
On 2013.12.30 15:56, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
>
> Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
> Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
>
> I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out.
>
> Here's the URL
I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x.
Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about
Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use.
I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out.
Here's the URL:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N5N5PG2
--
https://mail.
24 matches
Mail list logo
