Hello list,
thanks a lot to everybody for their suggestions. We're yet to make our
final decision, and the information you've provided is really helpful.
Best,
Victor.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
John Nagle wrote:
Sure they do. I have a complex web site, http://www.downside.com;,
that's implemented with Perl, Apache, and MySQL. It automatically reads
SEC
filings and parses them to produce financial analyses. It's been
running for seven years, and hasn't been modified in five,
Use php. I am lead programmer/maintainer of big website with a lot of
interactive stuff in user's backoffice and with a lot of interraction
to our non-web apps.
PHP is a crap, but programming for web in python is a pain in the ass.
And php programmers are cheaper. Especialy avoid mod_python.
On May 16, 4:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
See #3 below
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As
Ivan Tikhonov a écrit :
Use php. I am lead programmer/maintainer of big website with a lot of
interactive stuff in user's backoffice and with a lot of interraction
to our non-web apps.
PHP is a crap, but programming for web in python is a pain in the ass.
Strange enough, MVHO on this is
John Nagle a écrit :
(snip)
YouTube's home page is PHP. Try www.youtube.com/index.php.
That works, while the obvious alternatives don't.
If you look at the page HTML, you'll see things like
a href=/login?next=/index.php
onclick=_hbLink('LogIn','UtilityLinks');Log In/a
So
Please have a look at Plone and Zope.
During the month of January 2006, we've had approx. 167 million hits
plone.org
On 2007-05-16 23:04:17 +0200, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and
[Bruno Desthuilliers] John, I'm really getting tired of your systemic and
totally unconstructive criticism. If *you* are not happy with Python, by all
means use another language.
You are saying bad things about my darling! Python is my baby!
Shame on you John Nagle, if you do it again I'll
John Nagle a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
John Nagle a écrit :
Victor Kryukov wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
...
Our main requirement for tools we're going to
On May 16, 5:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we
On May 16, 2:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
Today, as we get better idea of what we need, we're going to re-write
everything from
Daniel Nogradi napisał(a):
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
http://www.youtube.com/results.xxx
http://www.youtube.com/results.php
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
http://www.youtube.com/results.xxx
http://www.youtube.com/results.php
http://www.youtube.com/results.py
Just wondering,
John Nagle a écrit :
Victor Kryukov wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
...
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members
Istvan Albert a écrit :
On May 16, 5:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
Jarek Zgoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Nogradi napisa?(a):
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
http://www.youtube.com/results.xxx
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
http://www.youtube.com/results.xxx
http://www.youtube.com/results.php
http://www.youtube.com/results.py
On May 16, 11:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
http://www.youtube.com/results.xxx
http://www.youtube.com/results.php
http://www.youtube.com/results.py
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
John Nagle a écrit :
Victor Kryukov wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
...
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
Alex Martelli wrote:
Jarek Zgoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Nogradi napisa?(a):
For example, it HAS been published elsewhere that YouTube uses lighttpd,
not Apache: http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd.
How do you explain these, then:
John Nagle wrote:
YouTube's home page is PHP. Try www.youtube.com/index.php.
That works, while the obvious alternatives don't.
If you look at the page HTML, you'll see things like
a href=/login?next=/index.php
onclick=_hbLink('LogIn','UtilityLinks');Log In/a
So there's
John Nagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a direct result of this, neither the Linux distro builders like
Red Hat nor major hosting providers provide Python environments that
just work. That's reality.
Try SuSE, OpenSUSE, Ubuntu... They just work. I've never had any
problem installing any
John Nagle wrote:
Many of the basic libraries for web related functions do have
problems. Even standard modules like urllib and SSL are buggy,
and have been for years. Outside the standard modules, it gets
worse, especially for ones with C components. Version incompatibility
for
On May 16, 5:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we
Victor Kryukov napisał(a):
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we shouldn't worry about their _versions_.
Victor Kryukov wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
And has stayed around to dog the developers, as so many quick fixes do ...
Today, as we get better idea of what we need, we're
John Nagle wrote:
Victor Kryukov wrote:
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we shouldn't worry
I think the first question I would have is what kind of dynamic
content are you talking about? Is this a web app kind of thing, or
just a content pushing site?
While Django might not be v1.0 yet, it seems very solid and stable,
and perfect for quickly building powerful content based dynamic
Jarek Zgoda wrote:
Victor Kryukov napisał(a):
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we shouldn't worry
Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
And although http://www.python.org/about/quotes/ lists many big names
and wonderful examples, be want more details. E.g. our understanding
is that Google uses python mostly for internal web-sites, and
performance is far from perfect their. YouTube
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
Today, as we get better idea of what we need, we're going to re-write
everything from scratch. Python is an obvious candidate for our team:
everybody knows
Victor Kryukov wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
...
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to
On May 16, 6:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
Today, as we get better idea of what we need, we're going to re-write
everything from
On May 16, 6:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
Today, as we get better idea of what we need, we're going to re-write
everything from
On May 16, 6:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
our team is going to rewrite our existing web-site, which has a lot of
dynamic content and was quickly prototyped some time ago.
Today, as we get better idea of what we need, we're going to re-write
everything from
36 matches
Mail list logo
