wrote in message
news:281f5806-8793-4fd2-877c-214927dda...@googlegroups.com...
>
> pip looked and saw that you already had it, so did nothing -- what did it
> report? In this caes:
>
> 'pip install -U ipython[notebook]'
>
> might have worked: -U means upgrade even if I already have it.
>
Indee
Le jeudi 22 mai 2014 01:14:29 UTC+2, chris@noaa.gov a écrit :
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:51:27 AM UTC-7, Frank Millman wrote:
>
>
>
> > I used it to install IPython, with the following results.
>
> >
>
> > First I ran 'pip install ipython', which worked.
>
> >
>
> > Then I read the I
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:51:27 AM UTC-7, Frank Millman wrote:
> I used it to install IPython, with the following results.
>
> First I ran 'pip install ipython', which worked.
>
> Then I read the IPython docs, which gave the following command to install
>
> Notebook -
>
> 'pip install ip
On 2014-05-21 01:40, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 14:09:43 -0400, "Bill Cunningham"
declaimed the following:
linear algebra, expanding and factoring equations of all degrees.
Geometry.
Without significant add-in libraries, probably not...
"Expanding and f
On 2014-05-21 01:59, Tony the Tiger wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 14:09:43 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
linear algebra, expanding and factoring equations of all degrees.
Geometry.
Sounds to me like you really want something like Maple, Mathematica, or
similar. Try http://www.scilab.org/
C
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 7:12:19 PM UTC+5:30, jmf wrote:
> I give up.
> Anyway, thanks.
Take a deep breath.
Be patient.
And post the backtrace (or whatever is the evidence of 'not working')
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:25:40 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 20/05/2014 12:20, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:43:45 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
> >> If it's possible, download get-pip.py from here:
> >>
> >> https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py
> >
> > Gives me sec
Le mardi 20 mai 2014 12:13:45 UTC+2, Tim Golden a écrit :
> On 20/05/2014 10:19, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 19 mai 2014 21:18:54 UTC+2, Tim Golden a �crit :
>
> >> On 19/05/2014 20:07, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>
>
> > Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to insta
"Tim Golden" wrote in message
news:537b42bc.3030...@timgolden.me.uk...
> On 20/05/2014 12:20, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:43:45 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
>>> If it's possible, download get-pip.py from here:
>>>
>>> https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py
>>
>> Gives me sec
On 20/05/2014 12:20, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:43:45 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
>> If it's possible, download get-pip.py from here:
>>
>> https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py
>
> Gives me secure connection failed error (in firefox)
>
I've reported on the PyPA issues lis
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:43:45 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
> If it's possible, download get-pip.py from here:
>
> https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py
Gives me secure connection failed error (in firefox)
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 20/05/2014 10:19, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le lundi 19 mai 2014 21:18:54 UTC+2, Tim Golden a écrit :
>> On 19/05/2014 20:07, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
> Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to install IPython
> for Py3.3 (win 7), I failed. I do not even succeed to
> under
Le lundi 19 mai 2014 21:18:54 UTC+2, Tim Golden a écrit :
> On 19/05/2014 20:07, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>> Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to install IPython
>
> >>
>
> >>> for Py3.3 (win 7), I failed. I do not even succeed to
>
> >>
>
> >>> understand how. Pip, setuptools, wh
On 19May2014 12:07, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le lundi 19 mai 2014 18:09:24 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to install IPython
> for Py3.3 (win 7), I failed. I do not even succeed to
> understand how. Pip, setuptools, whl or manualy with from the
> zip...
On 19/05/2014 20:07, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to install IPython
for Py3.3 (win 7), I failed. I do not even succeed to
understand how. Pip, setuptools, whl or manualy with from the
zip... completely lost. There is always something not working.
Le lundi 19 mai 2014 18:09:24 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> On Monday, May 19, 2014 8:26:11 PM UTC+5:30, jmf wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to install IPython
>
> > for Py3.3 (win 7), I failed. I do not even succeed to
>
> > understand how. Pip, setuptools, whl or ma
On Monday, May 19, 2014 8:26:11 PM UTC+5:30, jmf wrote:
> Yesterday, I spent one hour attemepting to install IPython
> for Py3.3 (win 7), I failed. I do not even succeed to
> understand how. Pip, setuptools, whl or manualy with from the
> zip... completely lost. There is always something not worki
On Monday 19 May 2014 09:24:18 Chris Angelico did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Rustom Mody
wrote:
> > On Monday, May 19, 2014 6:39:49 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> > The provers call the calculat
Le lundi 19 mai 2014 12:15:22 UTC+2, Fabien a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I am new on this forum (I come from IDL and am starting to learn python)
>
>
>
> This thread perfectly illustrates why Python is so scary to newcomers:
>
> one question, three answers: yes, no, maybe.
>
>
>
> Py
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, May 19, 2014 6:39:49 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> > The provers call the calculators as "Just applied not pure mathematicians"
>> > The calculators say of the provers
On Monday, May 19, 2014 6:39:49 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > The provers call the calculators as "Just applied not pure mathematicians"
> > The calculators say of the provers: "They are not mathematicians but
> > logicians"
> > (or
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> The provers call the calculators as "Just applied not pure mathematicians"
> The calculators say of the provers: "They are not mathematicians but
> logicians"
> (or philosophers)" [Chris had a funny quote on this a few weeks ago]
Which Chris
On Monday, May 19, 2014 3:45:22 PM UTC+5:30, Fabien wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am new on this forum (I come from IDL and am starting to learn python)
> This thread perfectly illustrates why Python is so scary to newcomers:
> one question, three answers: yes, no, maybe.
> Python-fans sure would a
On 19/05/2014 11:15, Fabien wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am new on this forum (I come from IDL and am starting to learn python)
>
> This thread perfectly illustrates why Python is so scary to newcomers:
> one question, three answers: yes, no, maybe.
Welcome to the Python world, Fabien.
But I'm s
Hi everyone,
I am new on this forum (I come from IDL and am starting to learn python)
This thread perfectly illustrates why Python is so scary to newcomers:
one question, three answers: yes, no, maybe.
Python-fans sure would argue "freedom of choice" is the most important,
but "being able to
On 2014-05-18 16:40, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2014-05-18, Bill Cunningham wrote:
Does Python have good mathematical capabilities?
No.
It has very good numerical computation capabilities, but it does not
really do "math" (at least not what a mathemetician would consider
"math").
Many m
"Grant Edwards" wrote in message
news:llak9u$8rs$1...@reader1.panix.com...
> On 2014-05-18, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
>> Does Python have good mathematical capabilities?
>
> No.
>
> It has very good numerical computation capabilities, but it does not
> really do "math" (at least not what a m
On 2014-05-18, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Does Python have good mathematical capabilities?
No.
It has very good numerical computation capabilities, but it does not
really do "math" (at least not what a mathemetician would consider
"math").
> I am interested in learning a second language for
On 18/05/2014 14:25, Roy Smith wrote:
In article <53783c5f$0$29977$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You may find that the IPython interactive interface to Python is useful.
It presents an interface which should be familiar to anyone with
experience with Mathematica
> Does Python have good mathematical capabilities?
SAGE: http://www.sagemath.org/
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <53783c5f$0$29977$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> You may find that the IPython interactive interface to Python is useful.
> It presents an interface which should be familiar to anyone with
> experience with Mathematica.
I second the IPython suggestio
"Steven D'Aprano" wrote in message
news:53783c5f$0$29977$c3e8da3
> You say you want to learn a *second* language, but you don't say what
> your first language is. Nor do you say what sort of mathematics you wish
> to do, or at what level. Depending on what you want to do, you might be
> best of
"Rustom Mody" wrote in message
news:09bbda59-9c37-44b0-acfc-0571d4fe8...@googlegroups.com...
> What does the word 'mathematical' connote for you?
> On the whole the term is so wide that its hard to answer without some
> more context.
>
> For example there's numpy,scipy for numerical and scienti
On Sat, 17 May 2014 23:13:11 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Does Python have good mathematical capabilities? I am interested in
> learning a second language for mathematical purposes. I am considering
> looking at python, perl, fortran, Adas out. It looked too complicated to
> learn. Perl looked
On 05/17/2014 08:13 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
Does Python have good mathematical capabilities? I am interested in
learning a second language for mathematical purposes. I am considering
looking at python, perl, fortran, Adas out. It looked too complicated to
learn. Perl looked easy and I hav
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Does Python have good mathematical capabilities? I am interested in
> learning a second language for mathematical purposes. I am considering
> looking at python, perl, fortran, Adas out. It looked too complicated to
> learn. Perl looked
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:43:11 AM UTC+5:30, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Does Python have good mathematical capabilities? I am interested in
>
> learning a second language for mathematical purposes. I am considering
>
> looking at python, perl, fortran, Adas out. It looked too complicated to
>
>
Does Python have good mathematical capabilities? I am interested in
learning a second language for mathematical purposes. I am considering
looking at python, perl, fortran, Adas out. It looked too complicated to
learn. Perl looked easy and I haven't really looked into python.
Bill
--
htt
38 matches
Mail list logo
