On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:52:28 +, "Schachner, Joseph (US)"
declaimed the following:
>Floating point will always be a can of worms, as long as people expect it to
>represent real numbers with more precision that float has. Usually this is
>not an issue, but sometimes it is. And, although thi
precision.
--- Joseph S.
Teledyne Confidential; Commercially Sensitive Business Data
-Original Message-
From: Pieter van Oostrum
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2022 10:25 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Are Floating Point Numbers still a Can of Worms?
Mostowski Collapse writes:
>
Mostowski Collapse writes:
> I also get:
>
> Python 3.11.0rc1 (main, Aug 8 2022, 11:30:54)
2.718281828459045**0.8618974796837966
> 2.367649
>
> Nice try, but isn't this one the more correct?
>
> ?- X is 2.718281828459045**0.8618974796837966.
> X = 2.36764897.
>
That's probably the a
