In article icqj46lnoaqkdr5igvqi9so62i30cac...@4ax.com, gneun...@comcast.net
says...
I don't think it's accurate to say that [some] experts really scorn
newbies, but I do agree that newbies are occasionally mistreated.
One thing newbies have to realize is that on Usenet you are quite
likely to
In article 16a7e301-2e85-47eb-971e-79acc4e07...@b35g2000yqi.
googlegroups.com, gnuist...@gmail.com says...
This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy
post
that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that
no one
need help me out. Then I was called lazy in one
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:10:16 +0200, francogrex fra...@grex.org
wrote:
Unfortunately many so-called experts in the field look down
on newbies and mistreat them (in any programming language forum),
forgetting in the process that they were also at a certain time
newbies until some gentle and nice
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:17 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy post
that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that no one
need help me out.
I have no record of such a post.
--
On 2010-07-15, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy post
that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that no one
need help me out. Then I was called lazy in one email and tersely
given JUST the last name of an author
On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman fate...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
Define Macro wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman fate...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
Define Macro wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I
bolega gnuist...@gmail.com writes:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness...
Are there already answers anywhere ?
How would a gury approach such a project ?
These two articles
http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~prechelt/Biblio/jccpprt_computer2000.pdf
On Jul 13, 11:18 pm, geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman fate...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
Define Macro wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to
On Jul 13, 11:35 pm, Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
bolega gnuist...@gmail.com writes:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness...
Are there already answers anywhere ?
How would a gury approach such a project ?
These two articles
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:17 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 13, 11:18 pm, geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:31 pm, Richard Fateman fate...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
Define Macro wrote:
On
On 7 July, 17:38, Rivka Miller rivkaumil...@gmail.com wrote:
Although C comes with a regex library,
C does not come with a regexp library
Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
Laurence according to wikipedia (search time 2s)
--
On 8 July, 08:08, Nick Keighley nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com
wrote:
On 7 July, 17:38, Rivka Miller rivkaumil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
Laurence according to wikipedia (search time 2s)
oops! He was born Laurence but changed it
Nick Keighley nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com writes:
On 8 July, 08:08, Nick Keighley nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com
wrote:
On 7 July, 17:38, Rivka Miller rivkaumil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter Deutsch stand for ?
Laurence according to wikipedia
On 14 June, 00:07, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:39:45 +0200, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J.
Bourguignon) wrote:
Nick Keighley nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com writes:
Nick Keighley nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com wrote:
Rivka Miller rivkaumil...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what the first initial of L. Peter
Tim Rentsch t...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
nanothermite911fbibustards nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com
How to make Lisp go faster than C
Didier Verna
Asking whether Lisp is faster than C is like asking why it's
colder in the mountains than it is in the summer.
YM warmer.
HTH;
On Jun 14, 1:07 am, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
On Jun 13, 4:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
On 20 June, 03:48, Tim Rentsch t...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
nanothermite911fbibustards nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com
writes:
Asking whether Lisp is faster than C is like asking why it's
colder in the mountains than it is in the summer.
original Karl Valentin would be colder outside
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
nanothermite911fbibustards nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com
writes:
Probably doesn't meet your intent, but this is a really impressive bit
of (whacky) art:
Lisp runs faster than C. Once you get more time away from screwing
Palestinians, and other false-flags, you will find ideas like
In article e1aa09cd-3bcd-4e9b-8f4c-e307a1424...@a2g2000prd.googlegroups.com,
bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would
answering the OP - didn't show up on c.l.py
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:07 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
Scheme is actually a lisp, isn't it ?
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:07 PM, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
Try the programming languages shootout.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
Good luck.
The
On 2010-06-13 16:07:54 -0700, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com said:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the
On Jun 13, 7:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
On Jun 13, 4:07 pm, bolega gnuist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compare LISP/Scheme/Python for their expressiveness.
For this, I propose a vanilla C interpreter. I have seen a book which
writes C interpreter in C.
The criteria would be the small size and high readability of the code.
Probably doesn't meet your intent, but this is a really impressive bit
of (whacky) art:
Lisp runs faster than C. Once you get more time away from screwing
Palestinians, and other false-flags, you will find ideas like these
How to make Lisp go faster than C
Didier Verna
Abstract
Contrary to
30 matches
Mail list logo
