Kay Schluehr wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>
>>Without detracting from the last sentence, I disagree.
>>
>>Peter Naur's honour is long overdue.
>>
>>Colin W.
>
>
> Sometimes it's hard for me to figure out about what somebody else
> disagrees with me in particular when I agree with him.
Ka
Kay Schluehr wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>
>>Without detracting from the last sentence, I disagree.
>>
>>Peter Naur's honour is long overdue.
>>
>>Colin W.
>
>
> Sometimes it's hard for me to figure out about what somebody else
> disagrees with me in particular when I agree with him.
>
Colin J. Williams wrote:
> Without detracting from the last sentence, I disagree.
>
> Peter Naur's honour is long overdue.
>
> Colin W.
Sometimes it's hard for me to figure out about what somebody else
disagrees with me in particular when I agree with him.
Is it possible that Peter Naur was forg
"Colin J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>>>http://campus.acm.org/public/pressroom/press_releases/3_2006/turing_3_01_2006.cfm
>>>
>>>Peter Naur was co-developer of Backus/Naur grammar notation, co-author
>>>and
>>>editor of the Algo
Kay Schluehr wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>>http://campus.acm.org/public/pressroom/press_releases/3_2006/turing_3_01_2006.cfm
>>
>>Peter Naur was co-developer of Backus/Naur grammar notation, co-author and
>>editor of the Algol 60 specification, and co-developer of a successful
>>Algol compiler.
Terry Reedy wrote:
> http://campus.acm.org/public/pressroom/press_releases/3_2006/turing_3_01_2006.cfm
>
> Peter Naur was co-developer of Backus/Naur grammar notation, co-author and
> editor of the Algol 60 specification, and co-developer of a successful
> Algol compiler.
That's very fine. Peter
