Re: Pycharm IDE

On 4/19/2023 7:48 PM, dn via Python-list wrote: On 20/04/2023 08.59, Thomas Passin wrote: On 4/19/2023 4:06 PM, Mark Bourne wrote: print(f'{LIMIT}) ^ I think this one should be: print(f'{LIMIT}') with the closing quote ;o) Yup a typo!  Where's pylint when I need it? but (and you design

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 20/04/2023 08.59, Thomas Passin wrote: On 4/19/2023 4:06 PM, Mark Bourne wrote: print(f'{LIMIT}) ^ I think this one should be: print(f'{LIMIT}') with the closing quote ;o) Yup a typo!  Where's pylint when I need it? but (and you designed it this way - right?) an excellent object-less

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 4/19/2023 4:06 PM, Mark Bourne wrote: print(f'{LIMIT}) ^ I think this one should be: print(f'{LIMIT}') with the closing quote ;o) Yup a typo! Where's pylint when I need it? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Pycharm IDE

Thomas Passin wrote: On 4/19/2023 1:27 AM, Kevin M. Wilson via Python-list wrote: Ok, I got rid of the "print (f'"I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n")"print ("I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n"), I think you misunderstand several things at the same time here. 1. T

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 4/19/2023 1:27 AM, Kevin M. Wilson via Python-list wrote: Ok, I got rid of the "print (f'"I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n")"print ("I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n"), I think you misunderstand several things at the same time here. 1. These errors originate

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 19/04/2023 21.13, Kevin M. Wilson wrote: Sorry the code snippet I sent was what is written in PyCharm. LIMIT is defined and is not causing an error! PyCharm is flagging the Parentheses at the end. It is not seeing the Parentheses as the end of the print function. def play_game(): number= ra

Re: Pycharm IDE

Kevin, As mentioned in another response, the format of these messages seems very confused. Please copy-paste all of (the pertinent part of) the code, and ensure that the line-endings are in the correct places, tab/indentation looks correct, etc? (this will allow us to copy the same code into

Re: Pycharm IDE

Ok, I got rid of the "print (f'"I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n")"print ("I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n"), and Pycharm stopped complaining about it... WHY?? Perplexed "When you pass through the waters, I will be with you: and when you pass through the rivers, t

Re: Pycharm IDE

print (f'"I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n")I had the impression that the format specifier 'f' was necessary for the print function, but the double quotes are for the string printed to the user, as a prompt!The Pycharm IDE is showing that it expects a single quotation mark or ')'

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 4/18/23 19:18, Kevin M. Wilson wrote: Why complain about a 'comma', or a ')'??? print (f'"I am thinking of a number between 1 to {LIMIT}\n") my version says it expects ' first (to close the fstring) then on a new line below it, it mentions the comma and ) I believe that is just showing

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 4/18/2023 7:18 PM, Kevin M. Wilson via Python-list wrote: Greetings... Kevin here:I need help, as you have guessed!I have this line: The Print Statement... Why complain about a 'comma', or a ')'???def play_game(): number = random.randint(1, LIMIT) print (f'"I am thinking of a number

Re: Pycharm IDE

On 19/04/2023 11.18, Kevin M. Wilson via Python-list wrote: Greetings... Kevin here:I need help, as you have guessed!I have this line: The Print Statement... Why complain about a 'comma', or a ')'???def play_game(): number = random.randint(1, LIMIT) print (f'"I am thinking of a number

Re: pycharm issue

From: *dn <mailto:pythonl...@danceswithmice.info> > *Sent: *Saturday, June 18, 2022 02:05 > *To: *python-list@python.org <mailto:python-list@python.org> > *Subject: *Re: pycharm issue > >   > > On 18/06/2022 10.52, GIORGOS PORIOTIS wrote: > >>  > Hello i have an

Re: pycharm issue

On 18/06/2022 10.52, GIORGOS PORIOTIS wrote: > > Hello i have an issue with my pycharm latest edition, it doesnt take the > files in the pycharm window , when i click on > > them , also intead of the pycharm picture on my py files i have the idle > picture ... This list is for Python (cf PyCharm

Re: Pycharm IDE: seeking an assist!

On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:36:50 + (UTC), "Kevin M. Wilson" declaimed the following: >The use of Java options environment variables detected. >Such variables override IDE configuration files (*.vmoptions) and may cause >performance and stability issues. >Please consider deleting these variables

Re: PyCharm settings - per: print('\N{flag: Mauritius}') not supported in py3.9

Yet another unicode issue XD Kind Regards, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer about | blog github Mauritius -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, at 21:38, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2020-06-24, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > > There is U+FF3F Fullwidth Low Line. > > > >> If there were, Python would not know what to do with it > > > > You can use it in variable names, but not at the beginning, and it isn't > > equivalent t

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On 2020-06-25 11:56:47 -0600, Michael Torrie wrote: > On 6/24/20 7:38 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2020-06-24, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > >> There is U+FF3F Fullwidth Low Line. > >> > >>> If there were, Python would not know what to do with it > >> > >> You can use it in variable names, but not a

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On 6/24/20 7:38 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2020-06-24, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > >> There is U+FF3F Fullwidth Low Line. >> >>> If there were, Python would not know what to do with it >> >> You can use it in variable names, but not at the beginning, and it isn't >> equivalent to two underscores,

Re: Pycharm offers only implementation of an abstract getter but not an abstract setter

You can freely leave Pycharm out of equation. In that case, there is a question how to force subclass to implement setter method? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Pycharm offers only implementation of an abstract getter but not an abstract setter

On 24/06/2020 22:46, zljubi...@gmail.com wrote: Why Pycharm didn't offer a setter as well as getter? This is a general Python mailing list. If you have specific questions/complaints about PyCharm, they are probably better addressed directly to the makers of PyCharm. -- Rhodri James *-* Kyn

Re: Pycharm offers only implementation of an abstract getter but not an abstract setter

This also works with no errors: from abc import ABC, abstractmethod class C(ABC): @property @abstractmethod def my_abstract_property(self): pass @my_abstract_property.setter @abstractmethod def my_abstract_property(self, val): pass class D(C): my

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On 2020-06-24, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > There is U+FF3F Fullwidth Low Line. > >> If there were, Python would not know what to do with it > > You can use it in variable names, but not at the beginning, and it isn't > equivalent to two underscores, of course: Ouch. Anybody caught using that shoul

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:54 PM Tony Kaloki wrote: > > Thanks for all your explanations, everyone. Hopefully, I'll know better next > time I come across a similar case. Now, to try and understand the rest of > Python... > Your last sentence - - - - I'm right there with you! (Reading it made me

Re: Pycharm offers only implementation of an abstract getter but not an abstract setter

If my subclass is as this: from subclassing.abstract.BaseSomeAbstract import BaseSomeAbstract class ChildSomeAbstract(BaseSomeAbstract): @property def abs_prop(self): return self._abs_prop I can create an instance of it with no errors. So x = ChildSomeAbstract() works with no p

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On 2020-06-24 13:48:18 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:49:36 +, Tony Kaloki > declaimed the following: > > Alexander, > > Thank you so much! It worked! Thank you. One question: in your > > reply, are you saying that Python would have treated the two > > separate unders

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 4:40 AM MRAB wrote: > > On 2020-06-24 18:59, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:51 AM Dennis Lee Bieber > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:49:36 +, Tony Kaloki > >> declaimed the following: > >> > >> >Alexander, > >> > Than

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

MRAB Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 7:28:52 PM To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore On 2020-06-24 18:59, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:51 AM Dennis Lee Bieber > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:49:36 +, Tony

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On 2020-06-24 18:59, Chris Angelico wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:51 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:49:36 +, Tony Kaloki declaimed the following: >Alexander, > Thank you so much! It worked! Thank you. One question: in your reply, are you saying t

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:51 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:49:36 +, Tony Kaloki > declaimed the following: > > >Alexander, > > Thank you so much! It worked! Thank you. One question: in > > your reply, are you saying that Python would have treated th

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

Am 23.06.20 um 22:49 schrieb Tony Kaloki: Alexander, Thank you so much! It worked! Thank you. One question: in your reply, are you saying that Python would have treated the two separate underscores the same way as a long underscore i.e. it's a stylistic choice rather than

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

and easy to follow - even for me > - reply. > Tony > > Get Outlook for Android > > From: Alexander Neilson > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:28:37 PM > To: Tony Kaloki > Cc: python-list@python.org > Subject: Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore > > Hi Tony &

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

Hi Tony The “long underscore” (often called Dunder as “double underscore”) is actually two underscores as you are seeing shown in PyCharm. However the display of it as one long underscore is a ligature (special font display to communicate clearer) and to enable these in PyCharm go to the sett

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

On 2020-06-23, Tony Kaloki wrote: >in your reply, are you saying that Python would have treated the >two separate underscores the same way as a long underscore No. There is no long underscore in Python. In Python, it's always two underscores. In some fonts, two underscores just _looks

Re: Pycharm Won't Do Long Underscore

case, thanks again for your quick and easy to follow - even for me - reply. Tony Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Alexander Neilson Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:28:37 PM To: Tony Kaloki Cc: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Pycharm Wo

Re: PyCharm, how to setup self contained subprojects

You are probably right. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyCharm, how to setup self contained subprojects

Le 22/05/2020 à 03:41, zljubi...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi, I should provide python code for (Spring) microservice patform. In microservice paradigm, each microservice should do a simple task, so python code beneath it should be very small. As a PyCharm (community) user, I don't know how to set u

Re: PyCharm installation

On Sun, May 19, 2019, 3:27 AM Syed Rizvi wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install PyCharm. First time when I installed it, it worked > well. It developed some problem and when I reinstalled PyCharm, it gives me > error. I have installed it several times but could not install it > > I am unable to inst

Re: PyCharm

I used the pycharm edu version from here: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm-edu/download/download-thanks.html?platform=mac input works fine on it. YMMV. > On 20-Jul-2018, at 9:15 PM 🌙, no@none.invalid wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 20:56:41 -0700, Michael Vilain > wrote: > >> I'm running PyC

Re: PyCharm

On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 20:56:41 -0700, Michael Vilain wrote: >I'm running PyCharm Edu (to go through their great tutorial). It's version is >2018.1.3, which I got from the web site. Unless you mistyped the version, >this is the current release and yours is very old. The date was just from a mess

Re: PyCharm

On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:51:51 +0200, Chris Warrick wrote: >On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 05:17, wrote: >> >> Win7 >> >> I was watching some tutorial videos on Python that recommended I use >> PyCharm and it worked pretty well until I tried to use input. >> >> I found this: >> https://youtrack.jetbrains.

Re: PyCharm

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 05:17, wrote: > > Win7 > > I was watching some tutorial videos on Python that recommended I use > PyCharm and it worked pretty well until I tried to use input. > > I found this: > https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/PY-27891 > > It says.. > Pavel Karateev commente

Re: PyCharm

I'm running PyCharm Edu (to go through their great tutorial). It's version is 2018.1.3, which I got from the web site. Unless you mistyped the version, this is the current release and yours is very old. -- Michael Vilain 650-322-6755 > On 20-Jul-2018, at 8:11 PM 🌙, no@none.invalid wrote: > > W

Re: PyCharm refactoring tool?

George Silva schrieb am 15.09.2014 um 21:49: > It's pretty useful. I use it for some time now and I very much like it. > [...] > The most powerful for me are the rename refactor and extract. Works like > charm (no pun intended). Dito. > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote: >>

Re: PyCharm refactoring tool?

It's pretty useful. I use it for some time now and I very much like it. There are some things that might not be available on Python because of it's duck typing behavior (Pycharm perhaps can't confirm that the type is boolean to suggest it's inversion, for instance). The most powerful for me are t

Re: PyCharm messed up my PyDev

Dear All, I managed to solve the problem. Something got messed up in the .metadata directory. After renaming it, Aptana Studio re-created it and I could successfully specify the Python interpreter. In PyCharm I specified the same workspace to use, maybe that was the problem. Laszlo On Thu, Dec

Re: PyCharm

On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 10:05 -0700, CoffeeKid wrote: > Your video is childish When you have someone called "Kid" calling you childish... that's pretty low. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyCharm

On Oct 15, 4:06 am, Kai Diefenbach wrote: > On 2010-10-13 23:36:31 +0200, Robert H said: > It sucks. > > http://regebro.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/python-ide-code-completion-test > > Kai Kai, Your video is childish and silly. A lot of IDE's use + to invoke code completion. You purposely did not

Re: PyCharm

In message , Jeffrey Gaynor wrote: > One thing that bugs me in refactoring though is that renaming a method or > variable does not necessarily work. It's supposed to track down all > references and correctly change them, but it tends to be hit or miss. Given Python’s dynamic nature, I think that

Re: PyCharm

In message , Jean- Michel Pichavant wrote: > Who want's to be bothered by windows popping everytime you type a letter > anyway ? Apparently the Java and Visual Studio crowd are big on this sort of thing. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyCharm

On Oct 14, 4:16 pm, Jeffrey Gaynor wrote: > Yip. I'm using it and for the most part like it. But... > > I used their Java IDE for years (it totally rocks, highly recommended), so I > it is very comfortable to use PyCharm. > > One thing that bugs me in refactoring though is that renaming a method

Re: PyCharm

On Oct 14, 8:49 pm, alex23 wrote: > Jeffrey Gaynor wrote: > > Certainly give it a shot. The only other IDE I found that was > > remotely close to it was Komodo which costs a lot more > > (Jetbrains is offering a 50% off coupon as a promotional offer > > for a while.) > > I recently tried out PyCh

Re: PyCharm

Kai Diefenbach wrote: On 2010-10-13 23:36:31 +0200, Robert H said: Since the new IDE from Jetbrains is out I was wondering if "you" are using it and what "you" think about it. It sucks. http://regebro.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/python-ide-code-completion-test Kai You're not serious, this 'b

Re: PyCharm

On 2010-10-13 23:36:31 +0200, Robert H said: Since the new IDE from Jetbrains is out I was wondering if "you" are using it and what "you" think about it. It sucks. http://regebro.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/python-ide-code-completion-test Kai -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-

Re: PyCharm

Hello, > One thing that bugs me in refactoring though is that renaming a method or > variable does not necessarily work. It's supposed to track down all > >references and correctly change them, but it tends to be hit or miss. Since we got a true dynamic language here (Python) I don't see a way

Re: PyCharm

I've been using PyCharm since the very first EAP releases, and downloaded 1.0 yesterday. I've tested out so many IDEs for use with Python, but PyCharm is the only one that gives me everything I want with just about zero work. Here's what won me over: 1. I can set up nose and coverage as a Run conf

Re: PyCharm

Jeffrey Gaynor wrote: > Certainly give it a shot. The only other IDE I found that was > remotely close to it was Komodo which costs a lot more > (Jetbrains is offering a 50% off coupon as a promotional offer > for a while.) I recently tried out PyCharm in anger after something (I forget what) in

Re: PyCharm

Yip. I'm using it and for the most part like it. But... I used their Java IDE for years (it totally rocks, highly recommended), so I it is very comfortable to use PyCharm. One thing that bugs me in refactoring though is that renaming a method or variable does not necessarily work. It's suppose