In article 4c4bd0b1$0$1624$742ec...@news.sonic.net,
John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
1. When writing to a TCP socket, write everything you have to write
with one send or write operation if at all possible.
Don't write a little at a time. That results in sending small
On 25-Jul-2010, at 5:52 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article 4c4bd0b1$0$1624$742ec...@news.sonic.net,
John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
1. When writing to a TCP socket, write everything you have to write
with one send or write operation if at all possible.
Don't write a
In message
mailman.1097.1279930004.1673.python-l...@python.org, Navkirat Singh wrote:
I had a question, programming sockets, what are the things that would
degrade performance and what steps could help in a performance boost?
Remember the old saying, “premature optimization is the root of all
On 25-Jul-2010, at 6:45 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message
mailman.1097.1279930004.1673.python-l...@python.org, Navkirat Singh wrote:
I had a question, programming sockets, what are the things that would
degrade performance and what steps could help in a performance boost?
On 7/23/2010 5:06 PM, Navkirat Singh wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I had a question, programming sockets, what are the things that would
degrade performance and what steps could help in a performance boost? I
would also appreciate being pointed to some formal documentation or
article.
1. When
Navkirat Singh wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I had a question, programming sockets, what are the things that would
degrade performance and what steps could help in a performance boost? I
would also appreciate being pointed to some formal documentation or
article.
I am new to this.
Interleaving
Thanks for the info : ). I will look into it ! Right now I am having a
strange problem. I am trying to use cookies and the import function
returns an error:
I am using python 3:
from http import cookies
importError: No module named http
Is it my configuration or has something changed
Navkirat Singh wrote:
Thanks for the info : ). I will look into it ! Right now I am having a
strange problem. I am trying to use cookies and the import function
returns an error:
I am using python 3:
from http import cookies
*importError:* No module named http
Is it my configuration or has
En Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:08:05 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi�:
On Mar 15, 8:18 am, Bryan Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie question: Can you write to the 'file-like object' a pickle,
and receive it intact-- as one string with nothing else?
Yes, but there's a
On Mar 16, 1:29 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:08:05 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi�:
On Mar 15, 8:18 am, Bryan Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie question: Can you write to the 'file-like object' a pickle,
and
En Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:18:44 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Well, lets say you have a situation where you're going to be
alternating between sending large and small chunks of data. Is the
solution to create a NetworkBuffer class and only call send when the
buffer is full, always
On Mar 15, 3:33 am, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:18:44 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Well, lets say you have a situation where you're going to be
alternating between sending large and small chunks of data. Is the
solution to create a NetworkBuffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
No need to reinvent the wheel. socket objects already have a makefile
method returning a file-like object, which behaves like a buffered socket.
That wheel is far from round, and needs some reinvention. Python's
file-like objects do not play
On Mar 15, 8:18 am, Bryan Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
No need to reinvent the wheel. socket objects already have a makefile
method returning a file-like object, which behaves like a buffered socket.
That wheel is far from round, and
Well, lets say you have a situation where you're going to be
alternating between sending large and small chunks of data. Is the
solution to create a NetworkBuffer class and only call send when the
buffer is full, always recv(8192)?
Or create a protocol where the first 16 bits (in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Dennis Lee Bieber had written:]
Or create a protocol where the first 16 bits (in network byte order)
contain a length value for the subsequent data, and use a receive
process that consists of:
leng = ntoh(socket.recv(2))
data = socket.receive(leng)
(the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, lets say you have a situation where you're going to be
alternating between sending large and small chunks of data. Is the
solution to create a NetworkBuffer class and only call send when the
buffer is full, always recv(8192)?
Buffering can often improve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:47 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Socket Performance
Can anyone explain why socket performance (throughput) varies
depending on the amount of data send and recv are called with?
For example: try creating a local
On Mar 13, 9:33 am, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Socket Performance
Can anyone explain why socket performance (throughput) varies
depending on the amount of data send and recv are
On 2008-03-13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example: try creating a local client/server (running on the same
computer) where the server sends the client a fixed amount of data.
Using method A, recv(8192) and sendall( ) with 8192 bytes
worth of data. Do this 100 times.
20 matches
Mail list logo
