On 2/07/2013 5:32 AM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
I copied the original question so that the rant on the other
> thread can continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
You've included the same set of code twice. Also, it doesn't run as is,
so you haven't reduced it to a minimal working example for us t
On 07/01/2013 05:16 PM, rusi wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:32:44 AM UTC+5:30, Dave Angel wrote:
Yes in this specific instance all this is probably true.
I believe however, that Joel's intent in reposting this is more global (and
important) in its scope, viz:
If this list persists i
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:32:44 AM UTC+5:30, Dave Angel wrote:
> But what was the expected output? And who cares? The code made no
> sense, was incomplete, and the posted question was nonsensical.
Yes in this specific instance all this is probably true.
I believe however, that Joel's intent in
On 07/01/2013 03:32 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
I copied the original question so that the rant on the other thread
can continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
number_drawn=()
def load(lot_number,number_drawn):
first=input("enter first lot: ")
last=input("enter last lot: ")
for l
On 1 July 2013 20:32, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> I copied the original question so that the rant on the other thread can
> continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
Thank you. I shall do the same below. Unfortunately I don't have high
hopes that any progress will be made on this thread -- Charles Be
