Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-23 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-03-23, Klaus Jantzen wrote: >>> And you would need tables showing which libraires are required for >>> which Python features: tkinter is optional, crypto is optional (or >>> at least used to be), etc. >> >> That's a good idea - that would make the simple table

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-23 Thread Thomas Nyberg
On 03/23/2017 03:45 AM, Klaus Jantzen wrote: The information must be somewhere because Python must have been compiled frequently and correctly for the various (important) OSs before making it available to the public. And I do not think that it is left up to "your luck" that the required packages

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-23 Thread Michael Torrie
On 03/23/2017 01:45 AM, Klaus Jantzen wrote: > The information must be somewhere because Python must have been compiled > frequently and correctly for the various (important) OSs before making > it available to the public. And I do not think that it is left up to > "your luck" that the required

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-23 Thread Klaus Jantzen
On 03/23/2017 12:23 AM, Jon Ribbens wrote: On 2017-03-22, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2017-03-22, Thomas Nyberg wrote: On 03/22/2017 03:22 PM, Jon Ribbens wrote: A simple table with a list of the library names, the debian package names, and the rpm

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Nathan Ernst wrote: > I would also add a link to the dependency's project page, in case building > from source is necessary. > > You don't always have root, and you're not always building with the system > supplied compiler. > > There are

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Nathan Ernst
I would also add a link to the dependency's project page, in case building from source is necessary. You don't always have root, and you're not always building with the system supplied compiler. There are a lot of situations that may require building from source. Far too many to even bother to

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Jon Ribbens
On 2017-03-22, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-03-22, Thomas Nyberg wrote: >> On 03/22/2017 03:22 PM, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>> A simple table with a list of the library names, the debian package >>> names, and the rpm names would provide the information

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Thomas Nyberg wrote: > On 03/22/2017 03:22 PM, Jon Ribbens wrote: >> >> A simple table with a list of the library names, the debian package >> names, and the rpm names would provide the information in a way that >> would be useful to everyone.

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-03-22, Thomas Nyberg wrote: > On 03/22/2017 03:22 PM, Jon Ribbens wrote: >> A simple table with a list of the library names, the debian package >> names, and the rpm names would provide the information in a way that >> would be useful to everyone. A _simple_ table

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Thomas Nyberg
On 03/22/2017 03:22 PM, Jon Ribbens wrote: A simple table with a list of the library names, the debian package names, and the rpm names would provide the information in a way that would be useful to everyone. I definitely agree, but it would be kind of difficult to maintain. I mean if you

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Klaus Jantzen
On 03/22/2017 06:34 PM, Thomas Nyberg wrote: On 03/22/2017 12:42 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote: Hello, in order to have the Python-SQLite support available one has to recompile Python. For the recompiliation to succeed a number of 'modules/libs' have to be present.

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Jon Ribbens
On 2017-03-22, Thomas Nyberg wrote: > I can't speak for the maintainers, but I don't think that providing such > a list is super reasonable considering that there are many different OSs > which have sometimes have slightly different library package names > (though of course

Re: Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Thomas Nyberg
On 03/22/2017 12:42 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote: Hello, in order to have the Python-SQLite support available one has to recompile Python. For the recompiliation to succeed a number of 'modules/libs' have to be present. In the internet I found the following list build-essential libz-dev

Recompilation of Python3.6.x

2017-03-22 Thread Klaus Jantzen
Hello, in order to have the Python-SQLite support available one has to recompile Python. For the recompiliation to succeed a number of 'modules/libs' have to be present. In the internet I found the following list build-essential libz-dev libreadline-dev libncursesw5-dev libssl-dev