El 19/11/13 23:43, glen herrmannsfeldt escribió:
And, importantly, the code runs fairly slow. Some years ago, I was
working with simple PERL programs that could process data at 1 megabyte
per minute. Rewriting in C, I got one megabyte per second. It is not too
unusual to run 10 times slower,
E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message
news:ro-dnch2dptbrhnpnz2dnuvz_rsdn...@earthlink.com...
Posted by E.D.G. on November 19, 2013
1. PERL PDL CALCULATION SPEED VERSUS PYTHON AND FORTRAN
2. COMPUTER PROGRAMMING PROJECTS
PERL PDL CALCULATION SPEED VERSUS PYTHON AND FORTRAN
In comp.lang.fortran E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message
news:ro-dnch2dptbrhnpnz2dnuvz_rsdn...@earthlink.com...
Posted by E.D.G. on November 19, 2013
1. PERL PDL CALCULATION SPEED VERSUS PYTHON AND FORTRAN
(snip)
This program
2013/11/19 glen herrmannsfeldt g...@ugcs.caltech.edu:
More recently, there are JIT systems which generate the intermediate
code, but then at the appropriate time (Just In Time) compile that to
machine code and execute it. This is common for Java, and more recently
for languages like Matlab.
glen herrmannsfeldt g...@ugcs.caltech.edu writes:
In comp.lang.fortran E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message
news:ro-dnch2dptbrhnpnz2dnuvz_rsdn...@earthlink.com...
Posted by E.D.G. on November 19, 2013
1. PERL PDL CALCULATION SPEED VERSUS
In comp.lang.fortran Rainer Weikusat rweiku...@mobileactivedefense.com wrote:
glen herrmannsfeldt g...@ugcs.caltech.edu writes:
In comp.lang.fortran E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
E.D.G. edgrs...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message
news:ro-dnch2dptbrhnpnz2dnuvz_rsdn...@earthlink.com...
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 AM, glen herrmannsfeldt
g...@ugcs.caltech.edu wrote:
I also used to use a BASIC system that allowed you to stop a program
(or the program stopped itself), change statements (fix bugs) and
continue on from where it stopped. Not all can do that, but pretty
much
