On 22.07.2020 15:00, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi MAL,
>
> would it be possible to reduce the amount of EuroPython spam on
> @python.org mailing lists to a sensible level? This mailing list is a
> general discussion list for the Python programming language. It's not a
> c
threads like "Opening our merchandise shop",
>"Find a new job", "Introducing our diamond sponsor", and "Presenting our
>conference booklet". That's just spam to advertise for the conference or
>a company. Some EP announcements were cross-posted to
On 23/07/2020 20:39, Christian Heimes wrote:
On 23/07/2020 02.12, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 22Jul2020 15:00, Christian Heimes wrote:
...
would it be possible to reduce the amount of EuroPython spam on
@python.org mailing lists to a sensible level? This mailing list is a
general discussion
shop",
> "Find a new job", "Introducing our diamond sponsor", and "Presenting our
> conference booklet". That's just spam to advertise for the conference or
> a company. Some EP announcements were cross-posted to multiple mailing
> lists like psf-commun...@
On 23/07/2020 02.12, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 22Jul2020 15:00, Christian Heimes wrote:
>> Hi MAL,
>>
>> would it be possible to reduce the amount of EuroPython spam on
>> @python.org mailing lists to a sensible level? This mailing list is a
>> general discussio
On 22Jul2020 15:00, Christian Heimes wrote:
>Hi MAL,
>
>would it be possible to reduce the amount of EuroPython spam on
>@python.org mailing lists to a sensible level? This mailing list is a
>general discussion list for the Python programming language. It's not a
>confer
Hi MAL,
would it be possible to reduce the amount of EuroPython spam on
@python.org mailing lists to a sensible level? This mailing list is a
general discussion list for the Python programming language. It's not a
conference advertisement list.
Something between 1 to 3 mails per conferenc
, September 19, 2018 12:12 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: [SPAM] Type error: not enough arguments for format string
Importance: Low
I'm just trying to follow along with the logging tutorial documentation and I
am getting this error:
import logging
logging.basicConfig(format= '%
On 2018-05-23, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> can someone explain to me why the mailing list (spam free) is not used by
> everybody?
1) I perfer the user-interface offered by my NNTP client (slrn).
2) I don't want to archive many years worth of dozens of mailing
lists (I l
On Wednesday 23 May 2018 11:20:34 Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> can someone explain to me why the mailing list (spam free) is not used
> by everybody?
>
> Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
> https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Brain damaged by facebook, AOL, M$, Google, yahoo yadda yadda
can someone explain to me why the mailing list (spam free) is not used by
everybody?
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
>
>
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2018-05-23 10:00:56 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 08:01:35 +0200, dieter declaimed
> the following:
>
> >Maybe something went wrong with the integration of your NTTP server
> >with the Gmane one?
>
> GMANE doesn't (to my knowledge) peer to NNTP servers. It provid
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> ...
> I didn't read on Gmane. I read on my usenet server. But the broken
> messages were all coming from Gmane.
I am reading with an NNTP client connected to the Gmane NNTP server and
and threading works - with very rare exceptions.
The exeptions are so rare, that they
On 2018-05-22, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> I didn't read on Gmane. I read on my usenet server. But the broken
> messages were all coming from Gmane. It is possible that the breakage
> only occurs when Gmane passes the message to other Usenet servers,
> although I have no idea how that could happen (
On 2018-05-22 20:42:43 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-05-22, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2018-05-21 15:42:28 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> I switched from Usenet to Gmane mainly because references headers are
> >> bit more consistent on Gmane, so threading works somewhat better.
> >
>
On 2018-05-22, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 15:42:28 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I switched from Usenet to Gmane mainly because references headers are
>> bit more consistent on Gmane, so threading works somewhat better.
>
> This is interesting, because Gmane was the reason I switched
On 2018-05-21 15:42:28 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I switched from Usenet to Gmane mainly because references headers are
> bit more consistent on Gmane, so threading works somewhat better.
This is interesting, because Gmane was the reason I switched from
reading on usenet to reading the mailingl
m wrote:
> W dniu 10.02.2018 o 15:57, C W Rose pisze:
>> No other groups (in the limited set which I read) have the problem,
>> and I don't understand why the spammers neither spam a range of
>> groups, nor change their adddresses more frequently. It may be
>> tha
On 2018-05-21, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:00:41AM +0200, m wrote:
>> I also almost stopped reading c.l.python, because of enormous spam
>> levels. Do I have any option to read it without spam, other than launch
>> my own filtering NNTP server and d
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:00:41AM +0200, m wrote:
> I also almost stopped reading c.l.python, because of enormous spam
> levels. Do I have any option to read it without spam, other than launch
> my own filtering NNTP server and do whack the mole game for myself?
>
> Maybe
W dniu 10.02.2018 o 15:57, C W Rose pisze:
> No other groups (in the limited set which I read) have the problem,
> and I don't understand why the spammers neither spam a range of
> groups, nor change their adddresses more frequently. It may be
> that destroying comp.lang.pytho
I've been reading a limited range of Usenet groups since the late 1980s,
and until the recent problems in comp.lang.python had never bothered with
any sort of filtering; it's easier just to ignore people. However, the
sheer volume of spam in comp.lang.python finally defeated me, so
> They are literally criminals, they use computer viruses and malware to
> hijack people's computers to send their spam, and you want to trust them
> and buy from them?
this was probably a "Drive By" posy to get the original spam more
attention & possibly bypass spa
own up, the rest might take the hint.
It would be really nice if someone could convice people to stopped
replying to spam posted from googlegroups. That way people who've
taken the common-sense approach and plonked all postings from google
groups wouldn't have to see them.
--
Grant
In article ,
skybuck2...@hotmail.com says...
>
> I see two solutions:
>
> 1. We build new architecture or adept current one so it's more like a
> blockchain, have to calculate some hash before being able to post and upload
> and such.
>
> or
>
> 2. We counter-attack by installing a special t
Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017 07:13:51 UTC+2 schrieb Rustom Mody:
> Of late there has been an explosion of spam
> Thought it was only a google-groups (USENET?) issue and would be barred from
> the mailing list.
>
> But then find its there in the mailing list archives as well
&g
nto the mail.python.org
system. Behind that is a SpamBayes instance to pick up any loose ends.
The Usenet gateway feeds into the system behind everything except the
SpamBayes instance. It gets only sporadic attention from me. If I'm not
paying attention, stuff which starts to "leak"
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:44:22 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-07-25, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
>
>> The posts are being made through Google Groups. Forwarding
>> the posts with headers to groups-ab...@google.com might help.
>
> I never has in the past. I (and many others) have for y
breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hence why I asked a couple of weeks back why we don't just bin the existing
group and start afresh with a new, properly moderated group.
Someone would need to volunteer to be the moderator.
Also, moderation is something of a consenting-adults
thing on usenet. It's
On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 8:29:07 AM UTC+1, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 25/07/2017 06:13, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Of late there has been an explosion of spam
> > Thought it was only a google-groups (USENET?) issue and would be barred
> > from the mailing list.
> >
>
On 25/07/2017 06:13, Rustom Mody wrote:
Of late there has been an explosion of spam
Thought it was only a google-groups (USENET?) issue and would be barred from
the mailing list.
But then find its there in the mailing list archives as well
Typical example:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail
On 2017-07-25 10:03, alister wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:29:56 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:50 PM, wrote:
I see two solutions:
1. We build new architecture or adept current one so it's more like a
blockchain, have to calculate some hash before being able to post a
On 2017-07-25, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> The posts are being made through Google Groups. Forwarding
> the posts with headers to groups-ab...@google.com might help.
I never has in the past. I (and many others) have for years and years
been plonking all posts made through Google Groups.
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:01:43 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
>> Since spammers are unlikely to be choosy about whom they spam:
>> Tentative conclusion: Something about the USENET-ML gateway is more leaky
>> out here than elsewhere
>
> It could be a
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:29:56 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:50 PM, wrote:
>> I see two solutions:
>>
>> 1. We build new architecture or adept current one so it's more like a
>> blockchain, have to calculate some hash before being able to post and
>> upload and such.
>>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:50 PM, wrote:
> I see two solutions:
>
> 1. We build new architecture or adept current one so it's more like a
> blockchain, have to calculate some hash before being able to post and upload
> and such.
>
> or
>
> 2. We counter-attack by installing a special tool, so we
I see two solutions:
1. We build new architecture or adept current one so it's more like a
blockchain, have to calculate some hash before being able to post and upload
and such.
or
2. We counter-attack by installing a special tool, so we all denial of service
attack the source of the message,
Rustom Mody writes:
> Since spammers are unlikely to be choosy about whom they spam:
> Tentative conclusion: Something about the USENET-ML gateway is more leaky
> out here than elsewhere
It could be a sort-of DOS attack by some disgruntled idiot. I wonder if
the email address in t
Of late there has been an explosion of spam
Thought it was only a google-groups (USENET?) issue and would be barred from
the mailing list.
But then find its there in the mailing list archives as well
Typical example:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2017-July/724085.html
What
On 04/07/2017 16:40, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:55 pm, Case Solution & Analysis wrote:
Our e-mail address is CASESOLUTIONSCENTRE (AT) GMAIL (DOT) COM. Please replace
(at) by @ and (dot) by .
Since we don't yet have a protocol for transmitting a punch to the face over
TCP/IP,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:55 pm, Case Solution & Analysis wrote:
> Our e-mail address is CASESOLUTIONSCENTRE (AT) GMAIL (DOT) COM. Please replace
> (at) by @ and (dot) by .
Since we don't yet have a protocol for transmitting a punch to the face over
TCP/IP, is it be wrong of me to wish that some whit
On 01/04/17 16:15, Mario R. Osorio wrote:
I'm not in the business of starting an argument about best/worse newsreader,
Ammammata, but could you please recommend a few?
Mozilla Thunderbird works very well. Spam is close to nothing using this
free nntp server: news.aioe.org
Re
Il giorno Sat 01 Apr 2017 09:15:41p, *Mario R. Osorio* ha inviato su
comp.lang.python il messaggio
news:d0e9d036-2924-4c2c-99b1-0d8cb02b9...@googlegroups.com. Vediamo cosa
ha scritto:
> I'm not in the business of starting an argument about best/worse
> newsreader, Ammammata, but could you please
I'm not in the business of starting an argument about best/worse newsreader,
Ammammata, but could you please recommend a few?
TIA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Il giorno Fri 31 Mar 2017 10:27:54a, *Ricardo A Baila* ha inviato su
comp.lang.python il messaggio
news:058a9744-44bf-4e6b-ae1d-28e1e348e...@googlegroups.com. Vediamo cosa
ha scritto:
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
>
> Could someone remove wucbad...@gmx.com from the group?
>
you better switch to a decen
the Google Group admins,
who allow much spam filtered out by python.org.
And/or switch to reading the python.org list or the news.gmane.org
newsgroup mirror.
Are you sure you are not receiving those as private messages?
GG trash is more likely.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org
Ricardo A Baila writes:
> Could someone remove wucbad...@gmx.com from the group?
Strange, I could not see such messages, neither in the newsgroup (gmane) nor
on the ML archives.
Are you sure you are not receiving those as private messages?
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò d
Le vendredi 31 mars 2017 10:28:08 UTC+2, Ricardo A Baila a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Could someone remove wucbad...@gmx.com from the group?
>
> Thanks
> Ricardo
And johnnypopo...@gmx.com as well.
Didn't go deep on the issue but could it be @gmx.com the issue?
Or at least, as the message is always
Hi all,
Could someone remove wucbad...@gmx.com from the group?
Thanks
Ricardo
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tuesday 07 March 2017 01:00:41 Greg Couch wrote:
> On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 8:08:44 AM UTC-8, Andrew Zyman wrote:
> > Why is this group have such an obscene number of spam posts ?
> > I'm subscribed to a few other google groups and this is the only one
> > that
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 8:08:44 AM UTC-8, Andrew Zyman wrote:
> Why is this group have such an obscene number of spam posts ?
> I'm subscribed to a few other google groups and this is the only one that has
> this issue.
If you do use google groups, please "Report abuse&
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 2:28:04 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 4:08:44 PM UTC, Andrew Zyman wrote:
> > Why is this group have such an obscene number of spam posts ?
> > I'm subscribed to a few other google groups and this is the on
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 4:08:44 PM UTC, Andrew Zyman wrote:
> Why is this group have such an obscene number of spam posts ?
> I'm subscribed to a few other google groups and this is the only one that has
> this issue.
The bulk having lots of block capitals and in Italian?
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Andrew Zyman wrote:
>> Or the mailing list, depending on how you like to read things. The
>> list has some additional filtering and moderation, which I appreciate.
>>
>> ChrisA
>
>
> you mean on python.org ?
Yeah. You can sign up here:
https://mail.python.org/mail
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 1:39:54 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Cholo Lennon wrote:
> > Google groups act like a "web frontend" for nntp protocol (on which this
> > group is based). I suppose Google doesn't filter spam mess
On 02/03/17 13:08, Andrew Zyman wrote:
Why is this group have such an obscene number of spam posts ?
I'm subscribed to a few other google groups and this is the only one that has
this issue.
Google groups act like a "web frontend" for nntp protocol (on which this
group is ba
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Cholo Lennon wrote:
> Google groups act like a "web frontend" for nntp protocol (on which this
> group is based). I suppose Google doesn't filter spam messages in its
> interface. Try using a newsreader like Mozilla Thunderbird and point i
Why is this group have such an obscene number of spam posts ?
I'm subscribed to a few other google groups and this is the only one that has
this issue.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-12-31 22:35, Deborah Swanson wrote:
Peter Otten wrote:
Deborah Swanson wrote:
> Here I have a real mess, in my opinion:
[corrected code:]
> if len(l1[st]) == 0:
> if len(l2[st]) > 0:
> l1[st] = l2[st]
> elif len(l2[st]) == 0:
> i
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> I'd imagine just having a list of 100 Italian words should give you a
> pretty accurate spam score. Extra points for all caps.
>
Thanks, but that's not how SpamBayes works. Have a look here if you're
interested:
Skip Montanaro :
> Yeah, we've been struggling with it over at mail.python.org. While
> incoming mail has all sorts of spam fighting bells and whistles,
> messages arriving from Usenet only has the SpamBayes filter. I'm sure
> I have a few more of these messages held. I wil
Honestly, I'm impressed by how little spam ever makes it onto the list.
Considering the absolute flood of email the lists get, it's impressive work.
Thank you for all the hard work you guys do for all the rest of us!
Thanks,
Cem Karan
On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Tim Golden wro
You may have noticed one or two more of the abusive spam messages slip
through onto the list. We do have traps for these but, as with most such
things, they need tuning. (We've discarded many more than you've seen).
As ever, kudos to Mark Sapiro of the Mailman team for tweaking our
cust
On 5/29/2016 4:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
Blasted directly to this, and several other python related lists.
The source address is NOT in the email headers, and I'm sure th
On Sunday 29 May 2016 14:23:27 Random832 wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
>
> I didn't actually see the original message. Maybe it was sent directly
> to you (and perhaps other us
On Sunday, May 29, 2016 at 11:55:04 AM UTC-7, Peter Pearson wrote:
>
> No, it reached me, too, through NNTP.
I also saw it, through the Google Groups gateway.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 29 May 2016 14:23:27 -0400, Random832 wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
>
> I didn't actually see the original message. Maybe it was sent directly
> to you (and perhaps
On Sun, May 29, 2016, at 14:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
I didn't actually see the original message. Maybe it was sent directly
to you (and perhaps other users, but not me) with a forged header
implying it came from the list?
-
Spam missed by the normally excellent spam filter. Ignore it.
On 5/29/2016 6:39 AM, Python-list wrote:
Look what I've just found on the web, that really cool, yeah, more info here
[likely toxic url snipped]
My Best, Python-list
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/ma
After clicking on submit button, a message is displayed on the same page
whether login was successful or not.
However after clicking on submit button, I lose control over the web page. I
can't use any selenium functions now like 'driver.find_element_by_name()'.
You need to wait until the submi
>
> This particular PITA of a spammer is one of the very few that I see on
> Thunderbird via gmane. I believe that Terry Reedy amongst others does a
> good job of keeping us relatively spam free. Thanks all.
Normally I ignore him (and yes, I see those posts too, in Gmail).
Stand-alone p
ntent-free posts like this, but as you already have the
answer you need, there's not a lot for me to add :)
ChrisA
This particular PITA of a spammer is one of the very few that I see on
Thunderbird via gmane. I believe that Terry Reedy amongst others does a
good job of keeping us relat
now and again as does BV BV whatever. For
any spam I go straight to gg and gmane and mark them as spam. Every
little counts :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
In the last week, python list received the following from google-groups.
vbf...@gmail.com via google-groups
NOW Watch Hot Sexy Star Aishwarya rai Bathing Videos In All Angles
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.general/749545
hussainc1...@gmail.com via gg
Sania Mirza Naked Pics at www.Z
On 9/5/2013 3:58 PM, bv4bv4...@gmail.com wrote:
Religious rant that passed the spam filter and moderation mechanism. I
am a new moderator and have asked the others if we can block this
address. Please do not add to the spam posts that do appear by
commenting on them. We do the best be can with
On 24/06/2013 15:22, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-06-22, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:49:51 +0100, MRAB wrote:
On 21/06/2013 21:44, Rick Johnson wrote:
[...]
Which in Python would be the "MutableArgumentWarning".
*school-
Psychopath Jack Wesolowski trolling and spamming the UseNet as Gary
Sokolisch wrote in
news:tv04oi1c11wu.1gv33jqjim98d$.d...@40tude.net:
> 3463
>
> W Gary Sokolich
> 801 Kings Road
> Newport Beach, CA 92663-5715
> (949) 650-5379
> Local PD
> 949-644-3681
>
> Residence:
> 1029 S Point View St
Dnia 2013-01-25, pią o godzinie 20:41 -0800, Angel pisze:
> but the real displayed fonts in the window are smaller (default size of 12,
> maybe).
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> A.
>
Did you tried this by simple:
---
root = Tk()
root.option_add('*
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:08:58 -0800, Robert Miles wrote:
> It now takes two people reporting the same spam to get google groups to
> do much about it. I just reported this one as well, though.
Speaking of spam, googlegroups, and other annoyances, please don't CC
python-list@python.
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:18:53 PM UTC-6, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 18/11/2012 19:31, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > The question was raised as to how much spam comes from googlegroups.
>
> I don't know the answer but I take the greatest pleasure in hurtling
> onto
On Sunday 18 November 2012 21:18:16 Robert Miles did opine:
> On Sunday, November 18, 2012 1:35:00 PM UTC-6, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > The question was raised as to how much spam comes from googlegroups.
> >
> > Not all, but more that half, I believe. This one does.
&g
On 18/11/2012 19:31, Terry Reedy wrote:
The question was raised as to how much spam comes from googlegroups.
I don't know the answer but I take the greatest pleasure in hurtling
onto the dread googlegroups and gmane to report spam. Thankfully it's
easy as the amount I receive vi
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 1:35:00 PM UTC-6, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The question was raised as to how much spam comes from googlegroups.
>
> Not all, but more that half, I believe. This one does.
>
>
>
> From: MoneyMaker
>
> ...
>
> Message-ID: &
The question was raised as to how much spam comes from googlegroups.
Not all, but more that half, I believe. This one does.
From: MoneyMaker
...
Message-ID: <2d2a0b98-c587-4459-9489-680b1ddc4...@googlegroups.com>
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Please don't spam the list with job adverts, post to the job board instead:
http://www.python.org/community/jobs/howto/
cheers,
Chris
On 03/05/2012 22:13, Preeti Bhattad wrote:
Hi there,
If you have USA work visa and if you reside in USA;
--
Simplistix - Content Management,
Hi Lie,
Thank you for the reply.
El Lunes Diciembre 5 2011, Lie Ryan escribió:
> On 11/30/2011 06:09 AM, DPalao wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm trying to use multiprocessing to parallelize a code. There is a
> > number of tasks (usually 12) that can be run independently. Each task
> > produces a numpy a
e explanation by "ryles" on
> >his/her mail of 27th aug 2009, with title "Re: Q: multiprocessing.Queue
> >size limitations or bug...". It is very clarifying.
> >After having read that I arranged the program such that the main process
> >did not need
On 11/30/2011 06:09 AM, DPalao wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use multiprocessing to parallelize a code. There is a number of
tasks (usually 12) that can be run independently. Each task produces a numpy
array, and at the end, those arrays must be combined.
I implemented this using Queues (multiproce
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:11:28 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:57 PM, wrote:
>> Why do people add character like [* SPAM *] to their subject
>> lines ?? Is it supposed to do something ?? I figured since
>> programmers hang out here, maybe
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:57 PM, wrote:
> Why do people add character like [* SPAM *] to their subject
> lines ?? Is it supposed to do something ?? I figured since
> programmers hang out here, maybe one of you know this.
People don't. It's something added by a spam
that I arranged the program such that the main process did
>not need to know when the others have finished, so I changed the process join
>call with a queue get call, until a None (one per process) is returned.
>
>Best,
>
>David
Why do people add character like[* SPAM *]
El Martes Noviembre 29 2011, DPalao escribió:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to use multiprocessing to parallelize a code. There is a number
> of tasks (usually 12) that can be run independently. Each task produces a
> numpy array, and at the end, those arrays must be combined.
> I implemented this using Qu
Hello,
I'm trying to use multiprocessing to parallelize a code. There is a number of
tasks (usually 12) that can be run independently. Each task produces a numpy
array, and at the end, those arrays must be combined.
I implemented this using Queues (multiprocessing.Queue): one for input and
anoth
I find python group is filled with spam mails, is there any way to filter
these mails before sending it to the group.
I can't see this situation with similar user group, such as the jsr.
George.
On 20/08/2011 07:07, "Ben Finney" wrote:
> Javier writes:
> You will
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:57 PM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> Wait, I get it. The spammer, Matty and you are all on gmail. You are
> all the same person, aren't you?
>
Gmail is all one person now? That would explain why I keep seeing
things I agree with. I had no idea there were so many of me arou
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:16:08 +0530
hackingKK wrote:
> Well, they might be indented in the right places but i don't know if
> loops, conditions, functions, if they all happen or not.
> :)
[Entire spam deleted AGAIN]
Good grief! Haven't you seen all the followups to that pos
;t think adding a smilie to a stupid post suddenly turns it
> into a joke. Nevertheless, the quality of the attempt is not really
> the issue here. The would-be humorist did not need to quote the spam.
Well, exactly. I don't think that anyone made any comment about the
quality of the joke
attempt is not really
the issue here. The would-be humorist did not need to quote the spam.
Please, don't do it.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:10:49 -0400
Rodrick Brown wrote:
> It's not the end of the world calm down I thought it was quite funny for a
> friday joke!
The first message might have been funny (if you are twelve) but the
rest were annoying and insulting.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy i
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Albert W. Hopkins
wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, August 19 at 17:12 (-0400), Matty Sarro said:
>
>>
>> If you're that offended then spend the cycles fixing the damn list so
>> it
>> stops having so much spam. You realize spa
1 - 100 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
