"Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > And as far as I know or
| > could find in the PEP index, C. Tismer has never submitted a PEP asking
| > that it be made so. Doing so would mean a loss of control, so there is
a
| > downside as well as the obvious upside
Bruno Desthuilliers a écrit :
> Steve Holden a écrit :
(snip)
>> Twisted is a complex set of packages
>
> Sure. Now I may be dumb, but I thought it was about stackless, not about
> Twisted...
Sorry, didn't saw your other post.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> Jean-Paul Calderone a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
My question is, why hasn't it been i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2007-08-09, Justin T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>JP Calderone:
>>>
>>> It's not Pythonic.
>>
>> Ha! I wish there was a way to indicate sarcasm on the net. You
>> almost got people all riled up!
>
>Sorry. There's NO WAY t
On 2007-08-09, Justin T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It's not Pythonic.
>>
>> Jean-Paul
>
> Ha! I wish there was a way to indicate sarcasm on the net. You
> almost got people all riled up!
Sorry. There's NO WAY to show sarcasm on the net. ;)
--
Neil Cerutti
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
> It's not Pythonic.
>
> Jean-Paul
Ha! I wish there was a way to indicate sarcasm on the net. You almost
got people all riled up!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 9, 8:57 am, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, which 'stackless'? The original continuation-stackless (of about 7
> years ago)? Or the more current tasklet-stackless (which I think is much
> younger than that)?
>
The current iteration. I can certianly understand Guido's dist
Steve Holden wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> Jean-Paul Calderone a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
My question is, why hasn't it been inte
"Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
| My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream python
| tree? Does it cause problems with the current C-extensions? It seems
| like if
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Jean-Paul Calderone a écrit :
>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
>>> My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream pyth
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 05:05:31 -0700, Michael Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:48 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T."
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awe
Jean-Paul Calderone a écrit :
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
>> My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream python
>> tree? Does it cause problems
On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:48 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
>> My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream
>> python
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
>My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream python
>tree? Does it cause problems with the current C-extensions? It seems
>lik
Hi,
I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream python
tree? Does it cause problems with the current C-extensions? It seems
like if something is fully compatible and better, then it would be
adopted. However,
15 matches
Mail list logo
