On Jan 27, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Gabriel Cosentino de Barros wrote:
Now going back on topic: A think that neighter Tk nor wxWindow is a
good choice for python. They both suck much of it when it came to
abstraction. They're still better than glade or gtk. But could improve
a lot. wxWindow has
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Thomas Bartkus schrieb:
When run under Linux, my wxPython programs follow the look and feel of my
Gnome desktop. When the same program is run on Windows, it follows that
desktop theme. Both Gnome and Windows XP alter the the controls design
according to user preferences.
Sure wxGlade/Boa/etc can help speed design and layout up, but what
happens when you want to do non standard things or just get stuck
because some thing just isn't working.
Then you add the necesary hand crafted code to the automatic
generated code. At least is what I did when I needed.
--
Alejandro Weinstein wrote:
Sure wxGlade/Boa/etc can help speed design and layout up, but what
happens when you want to do non standard things or just get stuck
because some thing just isn't working.
Then you add the necesary hand crafted code to the automatic
generated code. At least is what I
Jarek Zgoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron Laird wrote:
Well, while on Windows native look exists, on X11 native has other
meaning. On my wife's desktop it's KDE that is native, GNUStep is native
on mine and I strongly object calling GTK native, as one can
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:37:22 -0600, Thomas Bartkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarek Zgoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron Laird wrote:
Well, while on Windows native look exists, on X11 native has other
meaning. On my wife's desktop it's KDE that is native,
Steve Holden wrote:
I've tried a number of these tools, including BlackAdder, wxDesigner,
wxGlade and BoaConstructor. I even paid money for some of them.
I have also tried each of these and paid money for the first two. My
personal favorite is wxDesigner. It is very polished and worth every
Thomas Bartkus schrieb:
When run under Linux, my wxPython programs follow the look and feel of my
Gnome desktop. When the same program is run on Windows, it follows that
desktop theme. Both Gnome and Windows XP alter the the controls design
according to user preferences. wxPython GUIs reflect
I am especially interested in terms of learning curve, documentation,
portability across platforms Linux/Windows and anything else you care
to add. As I know only what I have read on this forum surfing the
web I would really appreciate the input of those who have used both,
or decided to use
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alejandro Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
.
.
the standard GUI for Python. I read some tutorials, but didn't go to
far, and didn't like the Tkinter looks too much. Then I tried
Esmail Bonakdarian [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have found ALL of the posts useful, thank you so much.
Please keep them coming! I am learning a lot.
I will probably play a bit with Tkinter and wxPython and see how
each feels, just as Peter Hansen
Cameron Laird wrote:
IMO, wxPython has a softert learning curve (specially if you use
wxGlade), is portable between unix/windows/mac, with the advantage
over Tkinter that it has a native look. Regarding documentation,
.
While people seem to mean a range of different
Definitely look at PyQt. It was the GUI framework I chose when going
through the same process 3 weeks ago. I have to disagree with F.Geiger
(sorry, F.Geiger), I think a GUI builder is a necessity. It saves you a
lot of time. The alternative is to keep changing your code until your
GUI looks as
Greetings all.
I will have about 2 weeks to pursue some Python related activities and
would like to learn more about the graphical end of things. In that
vein I would like some opinions regarding Tkinter and wxPython.
(The previously recommended PyGame is appropriate for me for now, but
I am
14 matches
Mail list logo
