On Tuesday 25 October 2005 00:31, Duncan Booth wrote:
> P.S. James, *please* could you avoid top-quoting
Were it not for Steve Holden's providing me with a link off the list, I would
have never known to what it is you are referring. I have read some relevant
literature to find that this is more
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 00:31, Duncan Booth wrote:
>> P.S. James, *please* could you avoid top-quoting
> James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry if I can't find a dumb terminal for a "VAX" with which to read my
> email. Perhaps, if i could, I would understand your frustration a l
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 14:27, Mike Meyer wrote:
> That's your right. Be aware that people will ignore, correct and/or
> complain about you doing so.
If I may be a complete ass: That should be "correct and/or complain about
*your* doing so."
James
--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Geno
James Stroud wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 14:27, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
>>That's your right. Be aware that people will ignore, correct and/or
>>complain about you doing so.
>
>
> If I may be a complete ass: That should be "correct and/or complain about
> *your* doing so."
>
You *may* be a
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:27:55 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 00:31, Duncan Booth wrote:
>> Their differences in styles, like mine, probably arise from the culture of
>> their respective fields. Most, like me, may not even know what the heck you
>> are talking about. Also,
James Stroud wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 00:31, Duncan Booth wrote:
>> P.S. James, *please* could you avoid top-quoting
>
> Were it not for Steve Holden's providing me with a link off the list,
> I would have never known to what it is you are referring. I have read
> some relevant literat
Duncan Booth wrote:
> James Stroud wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 25 October 2005 00:31, Duncan Booth wrote:
> >> P.S. James, *please* could you avoid top-quoting
> >
> > Were it not for Steve Holden's providing me with a link off the list,
> > I would have never known to what it is you are referring. I
Duncan Booth wrote:
> No, I didn't think it was malice which is why I just added what I
> considered to be a polite request at the end of my message. I assumed that
> most people either knew the phrase or could find out in a few seconds using
> Google so there wasn't much point in rehashing t
On 2005-10-26, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Stroud wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 00:31, Duncan Booth wrote:
>>> P.S. James, *please* could you avoid top-quoting
>>
>> Were it not for Steve Holden's providing me with a link off the list,
>> I would have never known to what
Grant Edwards wrote:
> Uh, no. Isn't what we're doing here top-quoting? The quoted
> stuff is at the top. Everything is in chronological order. I
> think what you're referring to is "top-posting".
Yes, Iain King already pointed this out.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2005-10-26, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Uh, no. Isn't what we're doing here top-quoting? The quoted
>> stuff is at the top. Everything is in chronological order. I
>> think what you're referring to is "top-posting".
>
> Yes, Iain King already pointed th
11 matches
Mail list logo
