On 08.06.2015 09:22, jbauer.use...@gmail.com wrote:
> Something that I could always use as a workaround would be to open up a
> listening port locally in one thread and connection to that local port in a
> different thread, then forward packets. But that's pretty ugly and I'd like
> to avoid it
Hi group,
is it possible to use the ssl module using a custom transport? It appears to me
as if currently the relationship between ssl.SSLSocket() and socket.socket() is
pretty entangled.
Suppose I do have some kind of reliable transport (let's say RS232) and a
connection that I have wrapped i
