Dhanyavaad (thank you)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
(snip)
>>You don't even need this to use callbacks. Remember, functions and
>>methods are objects, and other objects can be callable too...
>
> Eh?? I need an example.
Of callables ?
class FuncInDisguise(object):
def __init__(self, nam
bruno at modulix wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have used Perl for a long time, but I am something of an experimental
> > person and mean to try something new. Most of my 'work' with Vector
> > Linux entails the use of Perl (a bit of a misnomer as it is not now a
> > paid position -- I am
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2006 17:58:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed the
> following in comp.lang.python:
>
> >
> > Double-underscore methods are rewritten with the class name? That's an
> > ugly hack, but remember I'm coming from Perl. If the language doesn't
> > pull many other
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Scott David Daniels wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
> >> Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to
> >> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Scott David Daniels wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
>> Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to
>> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
>> lead to "shallow" bugs). Often
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>Nobody likes long-winded, abstract philosophical discussions on a
>>technology NG.
>
>
> not even on comp.lang.python ? ;-)
>
I wish :-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nobody likes long-winded, abstract philosophical discussions on a
> technology NG.
not even on comp.lang.python ? ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Exactly...this is how most of my Perl modules are written and tested,
actually.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
> Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to
> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
> lead to "shallow" bugs). Often for most of us judiciously pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have used Perl for a long time, but I am something of an experimental
> person and mean to try something new. Most of my 'work' with Vector
> Linux entails the use of Perl (a bit of a misnomer as it is not now a
> paid position -- I am not yet even out of K-12), and the
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
>
> Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to
> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
> lead to "shallow" bugs). Often for most of us judiciousl
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The one you get with Perl stinks on ice. More than
> > anything else, I would like to have a powerful OO environment where I
> > do not have to worry about the debugger sucking
> Do watch your language on this newsgroup. Lots of peop
On 12 Mar 2006 17:58:43 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Double-underscore methods are rewritten with the class
> name? That's an ugly hack, but remember I'm coming from
> Perl. If the language doesn't pull many other hijinks,
> that's OK.
This is GvR's way of saying "do not use double-underscore
> Python closures are apparently very poor, but from what I can surmise
> of the PyGTK2 page, instances of objects are dynamic enough to add new
> methods, so you get your callbacks, at least.
It's true that Python's "lambda" is somewhat limited, but this is
rarely a problem because you can define
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> > ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
> Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to
> rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
> lead to "shallow" bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed
> print statements suf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... Is the Python debugger fairly stable?
Yes, but it is not massively featured. The "Pythonic" way is to
rarely use a debugger (test first and straightforward code should
lead to "shallow" bugs). Often for most of us judiciously placed
print statements suffice.
> The
I have used Perl for a long time, but I am something of an experimental
person and mean to try something new. Most of my 'work' with Vector
Linux entails the use of Perl (a bit of a misnomer as it is not now a
paid position -- I am not yet even out of K-12), and there a lot of
things I love about i
18 matches
Mail list logo
