Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:00:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz wrote:
What I find really frustrating in Python (combined with usually bad
documentation) is that many people have different styles. The most
frustratinng being getFoo() vs .foo, vs get_foo().
`getFoo()` is
On 9/16/07, Colin J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:00:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz wrote:
What I find really frustrating in Python (combined with usually bad
documentation) is that many people have different styles. The most
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:17:18 -0400, Colin J. Williams wrote:
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
`getFoo()` is discouraged by PEP 8. […]
Perhaps PEP 8 needs rethinking. I prefer getFoo().
Yeah, *your* preference is a very good reason to rethink PEP 8… ;-)
Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack'
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
The problem with Java is that it makes it very painfull to bridge two
APIs together, while Python usually makes it a breeze (easy
delegation, no dumb-ass psycho-rigid type system). So Java's solution
(hyper-formalization) isn't necessary
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:00:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz wrote:
What I find really frustrating in Python (combined with usually bad
documentation) is that many people have different styles. The most
frustratinng being getFoo() vs .foo, vs get_foo().
`getFoo()` is discouraged by PEP 8. You don't
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:00:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz wrote:
What I find really frustrating in Python (combined with usually bad
documentation) is that many people have different styles. The most
frustratinng being getFoo() vs .foo, vs
Stefan Arentz a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
The problem with Java is that it makes it very painfull to bridge two
APIs together, while Python usually makes it a breeze (easy
delegation, no dumb-ass psycho-rigid type system). So Java's solution
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:10:47 +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
Does that sound like a good idea or would that be over formalization?
Sounds like over engineering/formalization to me.
You are aware of the Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs)?
Is something like the `Python Database API Specification
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:10:47 +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
My idea was to define Python Implementation Guidelines (PIGs) that
specify a problem formalize it enough so that implementations are
interchangeable (in this example create a module that has an
authenticate(username, password) method so
Hello,
On 30 Aug 2007 07:14:25 GMT, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:10:47 +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
Does that sound like a good idea or would that be over formalization?
Sounds like over engineering/formalization to me.
You are aware of the
On Aug 30, 12:10 am, Martin Marcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip!]
My idea was to define Python Implementation Guidelines (PIGs) that
specify a problem formalize it enough so that implementations are
interchangeable (in this example create a module that has an
authenticate(username,
Martin Marcher a écrit :
Hello,
having worked quite a bit with python in the last months (some Java
before, and some C++ before that) I was very impressed by an idea the
Java people had.
Explanation: the JSRs define how to implement certain services and or
features in Java so that they
Hello,
having worked quite a bit with python in the last months (some Java
before, and some C++ before that) I was very impressed by an idea the
Java people had.
Explanation: the JSRs define how to implement certain services and or
features in Java so that they can be reused. I haven't found
13 matches
Mail list logo
