Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
>
>> > But if you have an expression you want to match each dir against,
>> > the list comprehension is the best answer. And the trick to
>> > stuffing that new list into the ori
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Peng Yu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
> > But if you have an expression you want to match each dir against,
> > the list comprehension is the best answer. And the trick to
> > stuffing that new list into the original list object is to use
> > sli
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
>
>
> Peng Yu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Robert P. J. Day
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Peng Yu wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Diez B. Roggisch
wrote:
>
> Peng Yu schrieb:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:16:58 -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> What is a list-comprehension?
>
> Time for you to Read The Fine Manual.
>
> http://docs.python.org/tutorial/index.html
>
>
>> I tried the following code. The list 'l' will be ['a','b','
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:16:58 -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> What is a list-comprehension?
Time for you to Read The Fine Manual.
http://docs.python.org/tutorial/index.html
> I tried the following code. The list 'l' will be ['a','b','c'] rather
> than ['b','c'], which is what I want. It seems 'remove'
Peng Yu schrieb:
Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex. I
could use a for loop to do so. In a functional language, there is way
to do so without using the for loop.
Nonsense. For processing over ea
Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex. I
could use a for loop to do so. In a functional language, there is way
to do so without using the for loop.
In functional language, there is n
En Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0300, Peng Yu escribió:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>>> Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
>>> it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
>> it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex. I
>> could use a for loop to do so. In a functional
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
> it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex. I
> could use a for loop to do so. In a functional language, there is way
> to do so without using the for loo
Suppose I have a list of strings, A. I want to compute the list (call
it B) of strings that are elements of A but doesn't match a regex. I
could use a for loop to do so. In a functional language, there is way
to do so without using the for loop.
I'm wondering what is the best way to compute B in p
12 matches
Mail list logo
