Gerard Brunick wrote:
> My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
>
> Thanks,
> Gerard
transpose funcitons/methods:
http://numeric.scipy.org/
http://numpy.sourceforge.net/numdoc/numdoc.pdf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:27:55 -0500 in comp.lang.python, Gerard Brunick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
This may not be the "slickest" way, but I needed some practice with
list comprehensions (I've never really gotten used to them...)
This works with lis
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:21:59 -0600, Brian van den Broek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
>> My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gerard
>
>If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
>nic
Brian van den Broek wrote:
> Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
>
>>My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Gerard
>
>
> If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
> nicer fashion. But, since for all I know, my best effor
Gerard Brunick wrote:
> My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
>
> Thanks,
> Gerard
Ugly is not necessary not the slickest. To do better, there must be
something to compare to, right?
Claudio
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Gerard Brunick said unto the world upon 08/01/06 01:27 PM:
> My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
>
> Thanks,
> Gerard
If you'd posted your way, I might well have seen if I could do it in a
nicer fashion. But, since for all I know, my best efforts would result
in the approach you alre
My way is ugly. These has to be a better way.
Thanks,
Gerard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
