Hello
I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing my own
nice editor with python; so I've to choose among all those GUI toolkit's
ava
Hi,in stead of going for the "traditional" GUIS like wxPython, PyGtk and the like, you could consider using a browser based GUI. Try CherryPy for instance. See also here:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/442481regards,Dimitri On 3/10/06,
invitro81 <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 3/10/06, invitro81 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I've no idea which one I should use to start with.. I've read that
> tkinter seems to be the de facto standart in the pyhon community; but
> why? Is it the best available one or are theire other reasons? I read
> also a litte about wxpython an
invitro81 schreef:
> Hello
>
> I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
> geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
> nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing my own
> nice editor with python; so I've to choose among
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:36:18 +0100, invitro81 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
> geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
> nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing
Am Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:36:18 +0100 schrieb invitro81:
> Hello
>
> I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
> geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
> nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing my own
> nice edito
Thomas Guettler enlightened us with:
> The licence for QT is GPL, this means you cannot use it in
> commercial application. That is why I never looked at it.
Ehmm... from their website:
The Qt Commercial License is the correct license to use for the
construction of proprietary, commercial softwar
invitro81 on comp.lang.python said:
> again to make a choice is difficult; is there also some guy liking pyqt
> is it worse or should it be avoided because of the licencing policy for
> qt (which I also like..)?
>
> * Which one is the most fun to program with?
> * Which one is the
Alan Franzoni wrote:
> FLTK was interesting but seems to lack maintenance and support,
Looking at the News section of the project's home page, I can see
that updates were few and far between in 2004 and 2005, but the
action seems to have picked up again since:
http://pyfltk.sourceforge.net/#ne
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:07:52 +0100
Alan Franzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > again to make a choice is difficult; is there also some guy liking
> > pyqt is it worse or should it be avoided because of the licencing
> > policy for qt (which I also like..)?
> >
> > * Which one is the most fun
"invitro81" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But I've no idea which one I should use to start with..
One thing you'll need to carefully decide is where you want
to end up. The different toolkits have different limits on
where you can go. A simple example is printing
You guys are great :) thanx for the plenty answers and suggestions; I've
made my search through a little more and decided to start coding the
same app first with pygtk and second with wxpython.. and perhaps later
with pyqt.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Am Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:10:09 +0100 schrieb Sybren Stuvel:
> Thomas Guettler enlightened us with:
>> The licence for QT is GPL, this means you cannot use it in
>> commercial application. That is why I never looked at it.
>
> Ehmm... from their website:
>From http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/l
Thomas Guettler enlightened us with:
> There is a GPL version for Linux. But the GPL does not allow linking
> with closed source software.
The availability of a GPL license does not negate the availability of
a commercial license. You can write commercial, closed source software
on Linux using Qt
Thomas Guettler wrote:
>
> Have you read all the text?
>
> """
> Two qualities of the Qt Commercial License should be emphasized:
>
> You need it before you start development of proprietary software.
>
> You must purchase a Qt Commercial License from Trolltech or from any of
> its authorized resell
"Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
> is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
> licence, as is their right as the owner of the copyrighted work.
What is the deal here? Why would they refu
On 13 Mar 2006 10:19:05 -0800, Paul Rubin
<"http://phr.cx"@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> "Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
> > is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
> > licence, as is thei
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
> > is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
> > licence, as is their right as the owner of the copyrighted work.
>
> What is the de
i'm pretty much a newbie, too, and have been dabbling with some gui
tools
so far, i like pythoncard pretty well
it wraps wxpython and seems to be pretty easy to use
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paul Boddie on comp.lang.python said:
> Now, since the commercial licence is "per developer", some cunning
> outfit could claim that only one developer wrote their product (rather
> than one hundred developers, say), but this would be a fairly big
> breach of trust (although nothing unusual in th
Op 2006-03-13, Paul Boddie schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>> "Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
>> > is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
>> > licence, as is their
Alan Franzoni wrote:
>
> Just one thing I don't understand: if you're developing all your software
> inside your company, how would they know if you already coded it or you
> still have to?
I have no idea. But as I said elsewhere, I'm not in any sense a party
to the process that would attempt to d
On 14 Mar 2006 06:10:19 -0800, Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Franzoni wrote:
> >
> > Just one thing I don't understand: if you're developing all your software
> > inside your company, how would they know if you already coded it or you
> > still have to?
>
> I have no idea. But as I
> Michael Ekstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ME) wrote:
>ME> I've used both wxPython and PyGTK. I find wxPython to be horribly
>ME> un-pythonic; combining that some problems on the Mac, and some
>ME> other installation/environment issues, I ditched it for PyGTK.
But AFAIK GTK doesn't have a native
Hardly a showstopper: gtk works now (with X11), and will work even
better soon (native).
:-)
--
Ciao, Renato
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>tkinter (or better TK) has no good table widget.
.
.
.
http://tkinter.un
26 matches
Mail list logo
