Sybren Stuvel wrote:
It runs now, but some things aren't working.
Besides the crashing down, what else? I am very curious.
When I open a file and
click on the browse tab, I see the current directory. If I then
double-click on a Python file, I'd expect SPE to open it, but nothing
happens.
SPE - Stani's Python Editor enlightened us with:
This is a misinterpretation, SPE failed because of something else.
(As would have become clear if you would have run SPE in the
debugging mode 'python SPE.py --debug'.)
IMO displayed messages should be clear without having to resort to a
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
IMO displayed messages should be clear without having to resort to a
debugging mode.
I can agree on that.
Debugging mode should only be for removing bugs, not
for enlightenment of the user.
Unless he doesn't follow the installation instructions.
Anyway, apt-getting spe
SPE - Stani's Python Editor enlightened us with:
If you would have read the blog (http://pythonide.stani.be/blog),
you could clearly read this:
I haven't.
2. download and unpack the archive
SPE-0.8.1.d-wx2.6.1.0-no_setup.zip
If you follow these three steps nothing more, nothing less,
Sybren Stuvel schreef:
Sybren Stuvel enlightened us with:
SPE is already annoying because of all the new windows it opens...
Not a good start.
If you mean terminal windows, that has gone with the latest release
0.8.1.d, see http://pythonide.stani.be/blog
I remember using it before, to
Tony Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My goal is to make my conf files into a decent drop-in so you just put
them in your .vim directory and go, and post them next week.
OK, thank you.
FYI, I am still working on this but some changes in vim 7 are requiring
more
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My goal is to make my conf files into a decent drop-in so you just put
them in your .vim directory and go, and post them next week.
OK, thank
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Nelson wrote:
So, you bind check_current_block() to the Enter key?
Yeah. The binding's not quite just C-Ocheck_current_block()CR
because you need a bit of magic to keep autoindent working. I'll post
it with
I don't like, that one of the latest UltraEdit releases
was buggy causing 100%CPU load and 2MByte of harddisk
data traffic beeing idle, so I am looking for an alternative
for years, but instead of finding it I was forced lately
to spend money again on renewing my license.
Have you tried the
The best not free overall text editing tool on Windows
is UltraEdit
As I mentioned before, you should give Zeus a test drive.
Many Zeus users think it is the best programming tool for
the Windows platform:
http://www.zeusedit.com/awards.html
Jussi Jumppanen
Author: Zeus for Windows
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like, that one of the latest UltraEdit releases
was buggy causing 100%CPU load and 2MByte of harddisk
data traffic beeing idle, so I am looking for an alternative
for years, but instead of finding it I was forced lately
to spend money again on renewing my license.
I gave Zeus a try and it passed loading of a large (100 MByte)
text file (many other text editors fail here).
Zeus is not designed as a large file editor :(
It will try to load the entire file into memory so when you open
these very large files the RAM is quickly used up.
It looks at the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Nelson wrote:
1. Python syntax checking: as I'm typing along, if I input a syntax
error then the line is immediately highlighted in red.
What do you use to do this? Cream doesn't seem to do this oob.
Tony Nelson wrote:
OK, I can tell that this is Python code, not VI script stuff. I'll need
to see how your vimrc sets this up.
vim has a Python interpreter embedded in it (assuming it's a reasonably
complete build--it's possible to leave the interpreter, or even parts
of the vim scripting
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Nelson wrote:
OK, I can tell that this is Python code, not VI script stuff. I'll need
to see how your vimrc sets this up.
vim has a Python interpreter embedded in it (assuming it's a reasonably
complete
Tony Nelson wrote:
So, you bind check_current_block() to the Enter key?
Yeah. The binding's not quite just C-Ocheck_current_block()CR
because you need a bit of magic to keep autoindent working. I'll post
it with my conf files next week, essentially use C-R= with an empty
vim function wrapper
Tony Nelson wrote:
1. Python syntax checking: as I'm typing along, if I input a syntax
error then the line is immediately highlighted in red.
What do you use to do this? Cream doesn't seem to do this oob.
Nope. I'll try to package up my vimrc and get it uploaded somewhere
next week (busy
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
If you're on Windows XP why not try Xemacs? That's free and does syntax
highlighting etc. Doesn't have a problem with large files and so on.
rpd
Installed:
http://ftp.dk.xemacs.org/pub/emacs/xemacs/binaries/win32/InnoSetup/XEmacs%20Setup%2021.4.18-1.exe
Requesting
Go to Options. Near the bottom, it will say Edit Init.File Click on
it.
Make an entry on a separate line near the top as follows
(require 'python-mode)
Then save the init file.
When you open files with a .py extension xemacs should automatically go
into python mode
If you read the init.el
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
Go to Options. Near the bottom, it will say Edit Init.File Click on
it.
Done. A completely new file was created.
Make an entry on a separate line near the top as follows
(require 'python-mode)
Then save the init file.
Have copy/pasted to it including braces
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I get the feeling that a ot of people working with heavy IDEs don't
realize how capable vim/emacs are, so I'll give a brief rundown of what
my Vim environment does for me. (I do Python web development)--if you
I have the debug and the python shell just below the editor and the
project and the source assistent on the right pane. You don't have to
swtich tabs when you search or go to the python shell this way. The
source assistant tab is always visible. Since I did not configure it in
any special way, I
Claudio Grondi wrote:
The only thing what makes a difference to me is, that Wing 'understands'
Python code what results in features not available elsewhere (e.g. go to
definition).
This is something that pretty much any reasonable programming editor
will get you. Vim and emacs both do it.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claudio Grondi wrote:
The only thing what makes a difference to me is, that Wing 'understands'
Python code what results in features not available elsewhere (e.g. go to
definition).
This is something that pretty much any reasonable programming editor
will get you.
Good idea.
Try several.
I did.
Many of the above don't have either no gui designer or a rather poor
one.
eric is by far the best!
http://www.die-offenbachs.de/detlev/eric3.html
malv
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Claudio Grondi wrote:
Apparently Vim syntax highlighting analyses only the code it has already
'seen' within the editing window. This is not what I expect from a
mature editor.
I have stopped here, because I found this problem after three seconds of
using it, so imagine how much other
Claudio Grondi enlightened us with:
With [Strg]-[End] I went to the end of the file where I wanted to
continue editing, but the syntax highlighting told me there is no
code but only a comment. I checked it and found out, that Vim is
apparently not able to do proper highlighting when jumping to
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
Claudio Grondi enlightened us with:
With [Strg]-[End] I went to the end of the file where I wanted to
continue editing, but the syntax highlighting told me there is no
code but only a comment. I checked it and found out, that Vim is
apparently not able to do proper
Claudio Grondi enlightened us with:
The file I was editing was just 22 KByte large having 450 lines, so
you try here to explain to me, that for speed reasons Vim has to cut
it into pieces?
Yep.
Stani SPE based on Scintilla does it right, UltraEdit does it right,
Wing does it right, so what,
Sybren Stuvel enlightened us with:
SPE is already annoying because of all the new windows it opens...
Not a good start. I remember using it before, to check out the
Blender integration. Unfortunately, that didn't work. I'll give it
another go.
I downloaded it, tried to run it, then it stopped
I have been using vi/vim for a very long time and love it(now using
ion3 + vim, not even gvim on debian), but never found it blend well
with the Windows GUI.
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
Claudio Grondi enlightened us with:
The file I was editing was just 22 KByte large having 450 lines, so
you try
If you're on Windows XP why not try Xemacs? That's free and does syntax
highlighting etc. Doesn't have a problem with large files and so on.
rpd
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I haven't used an IDE in a long time but gave wing ide a try because
I wanted the same development platform on Linux and Windows.
I'm currently using Ultraedit and it works fine but needed something
more portable as I'm moving my main platform over to Ubuntu. I first
tried jedit and was
vinjvinj enlightened us with:
I haven't used an IDE in a long time but gave wing ide a try because
I wanted the same development platform on Linux and Windows.
I use gvim for that :)
- Ability to double click on the project plan and it hides and you
double click on it and it becomes visable
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
vinjvinj enlightened us with:
I haven't used an IDE in a long time but gave wing ide a try because
I wanted the same development platform on Linux and Windows.
I use gvim for that :)
- Ability to double click on the project plan and it hides and you
double click on
I haven't used an IDE in a long time but gave wing ide a try because
I wanted the same development platform on Linux and Windows.
I'm currently using Ultraedit and it works fine but needed something
more portable as I'm moving my main platform over to Ubuntu. I first
tried jedit and was
vinjvinj wrote:
I haven't used an IDE in a long time but gave wing ide a try because
I wanted the same development platform on Linux and Windows.
I'm currently using Ultraedit and it works fine but needed something
more portable as I'm moving my main platform over to Ubuntu.
This is also
James wrote:
I haven't used an IDE in a long time but gave wing ide a try because
I wanted the same development platform on Linux and Windows.
Then you owe it to yourself to also try SPE, PyDev and Boa Constructor
(got off to a slow start, but it looks promising now). All are free,
open
James wrote:
2.) Auto List members implementation is great. But what about call
tips? Just as important and every other Python IDE has it.
Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Wing shows calltip info in the Source Assistant panel. (Pro version
only, IIRC.)
However it's not as useful as call tips. You
39 matches
Mail list logo
