Re: Zipfile content reading via an iterator?

2008-01-29 Thread Tim Chase
I'm dealing with several large items that have been zipped up to get quite impressive compression. However, uncompressed, they're large enough to thrash my memory to swap and in general do bad performance-related things. I'm trying to figure out how to produce a file-like iterator out of

Re: Zipfile content reading via an iterator?

2008-01-29 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:06:12 -0200, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi�: Just to follow up on this, I dropped the the 2.6 version of zipfile.py in my project folder (where the machine is currently running Python2.4), used the ZipFile.open() and it worked fine. [...] Anyways, thanks to

Re: Zipfile content reading via an iterator?

2007-12-12 Thread Tim Chase
Gabriel Genellina wrote: I'm dealing with several large items that have been zipped up to get quite impressive compression. However, uncompressed, they're large enough to thrash my memory to swap and in general do bad performance-related things. I'm trying to figure out how to produce a

Re: Zipfile content reading via an iterator?

2007-12-12 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:03:12 -0300, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: As a side question, is there any catalog of Time Machine items (instances where folks have asked for a feature only to have the response be it's already implemented in the development version)? I've seen the Time

Zipfile content reading via an iterator?

2007-12-11 Thread Tim Chase
I'm dealing with several large items that have been zipped up to get quite impressive compression. However, uncompressed, they're large enough to thrash my memory to swap and in general do bad performance-related things. I'm trying to figure out how to produce a file-like iterator out of the

Re: Zipfile content reading via an iterator?

2007-12-11 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:14:14 -0300, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi�: I'm dealing with several large items that have been zipped up to get quite impressive compression. However, uncompressed, they're large enough to thrash my memory to swap and in general do bad performance-related