For array.array B means unsigned char, and such arrays accept to be
initialized from (str) strings too, this is quite useful:
from array import array
a = array(B, hello)
But it seems such capability isn't shared with the append:
a.extend(hello)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:44:25 -0800, bearophileHUGS wrote:
For array.array B means unsigned char, and such arrays accept to be
initialized from (str) strings too, this is quite useful:
from array import array
a = array(B, hello)
But it seems such capability isn't shared with the append:
Steven D'Aprano:
No you're not. You're describing a quite complicated shell. You're
describing a hypothetical shell with features other actual shells don't
have, so therefore it can't possibly be as simple as possible.
You are right, it's not really simple, but:
- It has just the basic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This Mathematica shell allows you to edit small programs (like 1-15
lines of code) as input blocks, and later you can click on them and
edit them. When you press shift-enter inside a block, that small
program runs and its output goes just below it (and not at the end
Duncan Booth:
Later you can click on them and bring them back
to the bottom of the input buffer for further editing (so no confusing
output appearing out of order),
I think that's worse, not better. You end with a messy final document
(log), so finding things into it (during the editing too)
I have also used the shell of Mathematica. It's quite powerful and it
can show graphics too inlined, but globally I don't like it fully
because it makes editing small programs a pain (for me)...
I use Vim to edit python code and can execute any selection (F3) or single
lines (F2)
whenever I
On 2006-12-20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For array.array B means unsigned char, and such arrays accept to be
initialized from (str) strings too, this is quite useful:
from array import array
a = array(B, hello)
But it seems such capability isn't shared with the append:
