On Oct 10, 8:43 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2:26 am, niklasr wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 10:17 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 8, 3:11 pm, niklasr wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
>
> > > > > NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > > > > > Hello, my basic question is w
On Oct 10, 2:26 am, niklasr wrote:
> On Oct 8, 10:17 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 3:11 pm, niklasr wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
>
> > > > NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > > > > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> > > > > restruc
On Oct 8, 8:33 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" wrote:
> En Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:11:04 -0300, niklasr escribió:
>
> > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> >> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
> >> > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> >> > restructuring datetime.datetime to datet
On Oct 8, 10:17 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Oct 8, 3:11 pm, niklasr wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
>
> > > NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > > > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> > > > restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
> > > > Both
On Oct 8, 7:34 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> niklasr schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> >> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> >>> Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> >>> restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
> >>> Both works but only one s
On Oct 8, 3:11 pm, niklasr wrote:
> On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> > > restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
> > > Both works but only one should be chosen probably adju
En Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:11:04 -0300, niklasr escribió:
On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
NiklasRTZ schrieb:
> Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
- how to import is mostly a matter of taste, as long as
niklasr schrieb:
On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
NiklasRTZ schrieb:
Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
Both works but only one should be chosen probably adjust my package to
comply to dependencies.
Spec int
On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
>
> > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> > restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
> > Both works but only one should be chosen probably adjust my package to
> > comply to dependencies.
> > Spec i
NiklasRTZ schrieb:
Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
Both works but only one should be chosen probably adjust my package to
comply to dependencies.
Spec integrated code where datetime.datetime.now() refactored to
datetime.
Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
Both works but only one should be chosen probably adjust my package to
comply to dependencies.
Spec integrated code where datetime.datetime.now() refactored to
datetime.now()
set rather
from
11 matches
Mail list logo