Op Mon, 26 May 2008 15:49:33 -0400, schreef Dan Upton:
> The point about them looking very little like x86/ARM/etc chips is the
> important part though--IIRC, part of the failure of Java machines was
> lousy support for preexisting code, due to the optimizations for Java
> bytecode, and I expect t
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 15:49:33 -0400, Dan Upton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it would necessarily look like the CPython VM, except
>> for the decode stage (this b
On May 26, 6:06 pm, Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 15:49:33 -0400, Dan Upton wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if it would necessarily look like the CPython VM, except
> > for the decode stage (this being said with
On Mon, 26 May 2008 15:49:33 -0400, Dan Upton wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if it would necessarily look like the CPython VM, except
> for the decode stage (this being said without any knowledge of the
> CPython implementation, but with more
On May 29, 5:32 am, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Avowkind wrote:
> > On May 27, 6:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> (might not be the right forum for this but...)
>
> >> what is the definition of a highlevel-language?
>
> >> wel
Avowkind wrote:
On May 27, 6:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(might not be the right forum for this but...)
what is the definition of a highlevel-language?
well there isnt one specifically and wikipedia and the like gives just
a very general description obv you can say it abstracts away
"inhahe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I like to think of a language that would combine low-level and high-level
> features to be used at the programmer's whim. C--, High Level Assembly, and
> C++ with in-line assembly are examples, but none of them come as high-level
> as Python. Other possib
On May 26, 3:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> what is the definition of a highlevel-language?
>
There's no formal definition of high level language. Thus, the
following are true:
1) You can safely treat it as buzzword
2) You can't formally define a level hierarchy of lang
On May 27, 6:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (might not be the right forum for this but...)
>
> what is the definition of a highlevel-language?
>
> well there isnt one specifically and wikipedia and the like gives just
> a very general description obv you can say it abstr
