A recent problem with a fastcgi script leads me to ask if there's any well
defined way to fully reload a python fastcgi process. I know that people do
tricks like unloading/reloading all modules, but it seems there's no obvious way
to get python to restart itself. I believe that the
Steffen Ebermann wrote:
Hi,
this might be a little off topic (could be any other language)
but I'm trying to set up Python to use FastCGI instead of plain CGI.
The basic setup is no problem but every tutorial (including Python's
'HOWTO Use Python in the web') ends with
Steffen Ebermann wrote:
Hi,
this might be a little off topic (could be any other language)
but I'm trying to set up Python to use FastCGI instead of plain CGI.
The basic setup is no problem but every tutorial (including Python's
'HOWTO Use Python in the web') ends with
Hi,
this might be a little off topic (could be any other language)
but I'm trying to set up Python to use FastCGI instead of plain CGI.
The basic setup is no problem but every tutorial (including Python's
'HOWTO Use Python in the web') ends with some basic dispatch file and
n external fcgi socket server using
flup.
I managed to get apache to accept the long running socket server as the
FastCgiAccessChecker, but all attempts at using the access check seem to fail
with some kind of fastcgi protocol error
..server.fcgi" aborted: protocol error: invalid F
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Is there a straightforward way to convert an XML-RPC server application
> (written for SimpleXMLRPCServer) to use WSGI so that it can be used as s
> fastcgi server? By "straightforward" I mean something simple, without
> using some external framework.
Hi,
Is there a straightforward way to convert an XML-RPC server application
(written for SimpleXMLRPCServer) to use WSGI so that it can be used as s
fastcgi server? By "straightforward" I mean something simple, without
using some external framework.
Alternatively, I don't really
Microsoft's IIS server recently added native support for FastCGI. The
big roadblock to Python support seems to be that socket.fromfd()
doesn't work on Windows.
Are there any plans to add this or similar functionality to the
Windows build?
Thanks,
Drew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
I have a python fastcgi app. Is there any library in python that I can use
to send a FASTCGI request to the fastcgi app?
thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Nagle wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>> The "JonPy" version:
>>> http://jonpy.sourceforge.net/fcgi.html
>>> Last revised in 2004.
>>
>> I'd recommend my one, but it's just possible I'm not impartial ;-)
>
> Does it work with current Pythons? (2.
John Nagle wrote:
>What's the recommended FastCGI module for Python. There are at least five:
>
> The Robin Dunn / Total Control Software version:
> http://alldunn.com/python/fcgi.py
> Last revised in 1998.
...
we are using a slightly mod
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Nagle wrote:
>
>> The "JonPy" version:
>> http://jonpy.sourceforge.net/fcgi.html
>> Last revised in 2004.
>
>
> I'd recommend my one, but it's just possible I'm not impartial ;-)
Does it work with current Pythons? (2.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Nagle wrote:
> The "JonPy" version:
> http://jonpy.sourceforge.net/fcgi.html
> Last revised in 2004.
I'd recommend my one, but it's just possible I'm not impartial ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What's the recommended FastCGI module for Python. There are at least five:
The Robin Dunn / Total Control Software version:
http://alldunn.com/python/fcgi.py
Last revised in 1998.
The "JonPy" version:
http://jonpy.sourceforge.net/fcgi.ht
igell uses subpath behind CGI file name is a little strange to me.
Nonetheless,
Karrigell looks very nice to me but I may start with CherryPy.
What's missing (according to my requirement/wishlist) is, as a web server,
the
build-in web server does not handle CGI or FastCGI apps, making python
th
I'm using CherryPy 2.2.1.
I just ran benchmark.py multiple times. The fastest it got is 195 req/sec,
with
50 threads. Python was taking 50+% CPU when the test was running.
> It would be good to know which version of CherryPy you are using. That
> wiki page is talking about the CP 2.0 branch; 2.1
Just thought I'd mention it. As stated in some posts I put on the list
in the last few days, I'm working on a FastCGI server for python. Of
course its not as fast as lighttpd, but I think it still has many
applications. I've currently got a *very* simple prototype, but I
expect the
, it would be nice to extend it by putting
>> code
>> right into the web server. The performance should be better than FastCGI
>> because it removes the cost to send the requests/replies back and forth.
>
> you'll need to make a distinction between a webserver writt
> >> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
> If it is a Python web server, it would be nice to extend it by putting code
> right into the web server. The performance should be better than FastCGI
> because it removes the cost to send the requests/replies back
Jack wrote:
> I wrote the last posting at late late night and I didn't know what I was
> typing at that time ;-p
>
> I didn't mean the test with CherryPy was not concurrent
> connections, or the test with lighttpd was all concurrent
> connections. I actually tried both concurrent (-c in ab command
I wrote the last posting at late late night and I didn't know what I was
typing at that time ;-p
I didn't mean the test with CherryPy was not concurrent
connections, or the test with lighttpd was all concurrent
connections. I actually tried both concurrent (-c in ab command line)
and non-concurren
On 7 Jul 2006 06:27:43 -0700, Gerard Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tim Williams wrote:
> > On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
> > > My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
> > > CherryP
Tim Williams wrote:
> On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
> > My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
> > CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
> > lighttpd can han
On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
> My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
> CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
> lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent reque
I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd.
My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose.
CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while
lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent requests.
> You haven't really said much about your requi
extend it by putting code
right into the web server. The performance should be better than FastCGI
because it removes the cost to send the requests/replies back and forth.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
>
> do that.
>
> If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
> python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
lighttpd is a great web server. I just didn't want to bother download the
source,
lse has an idea about medusa or twisted performance.
Any chance that it's close to Apache?
But even so, I guess I may still have to go with lighttpd for FastCGI/
CGI/SCGI support.
> You haven't really said much about your requirements though. Perhaps
> if you describe them in more
Jack wrote:
> I will have to install lighttpd or other web servers.
do that.
If all you need is a webserver there's little reason to have it in
python. Just use one of the several high quality open source webservers.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
n an embedded platform where disk
space is at a premium there's not really much point).
A bigger problem, I reckon, is that twisted.web doesn't support FastCGI
and twisted.web2 is still a moving target.
You haven't really said much about your requirements though. Perhaps
if you d
rs is performance.
That's why I start to look into medusa or twisted-based servers. Twisted
seems too big and complicated for what I really want to do and the
original medusa web server only has very basic functionality.
And I'd like the web server to have CGI/FastCGI and possible S
Greetings, I'm now merrily on my way developing a FastCGI Server in
python.
Thanks to help of others on this list I've got a proof of concept up
and
running.
Herein lies my question: My goal is to make this module as flexible as
possible,
so that it can receive requests from Simp
Hi folks,
I'm trying to get lighttpd, fastcgi & python working on a 2.4.21.x i686
linux system. I tried following the steps in:
http://www.cleverdevil.org/computing/24/python-fastcgi-wsgi-and-lighttpd
Some of the lighttpd.conf setting are slightly different from those in
that article
Hi
Is anyone using fastcgi (the fastcgi.py file floasting around, or jonpy)
in a poduction environment?
I'm just wondering how stable python would be with fastvgi and lightttpd
thanks
Jason
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
34 matches
Mail list logo
