ianaré wrote:
> On Dec 21, 3:29 pm, "ianaré" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have a for loop which included the line:
>>
>> items_ren.append(join(newPath,renamedItem))
>>
>> I changed it to this:
>> items_ren.append([join(newPath,renamedItem), False])
>>
>> And processing speed is n
ianaré wrote:
>> I changed it to this:
>> items_ren.append([join(newPath,renamedItem), False])
>>
>> And processing speed is now much much slower. For 5780 items the old
>> function would take 9.5 seconds (there is other stuff going on
>> obviously), after changing that single line, speed is now 5
On Dec 21, 3:29 pm, "ianaré" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a for loop which included the line:
>
> items_ren.append(join(newPath,renamedItem))
>
> I changed it to this:
> items_ren.append([join(newPath,renamedItem), False])
>
> And processing speed is now much much slower. For 57
Hey all,
I have a for loop which included the line:
items_ren.append(join(newPath,renamedItem))
I changed it to this:
items_ren.append([join(newPath,renamedItem), False])
And processing speed is now much much slower. For 5780 items the old
function would take 9.5 seconds (there is other stuff g