On Apr 7, 2:53 am, "R. David Murray" wrote:
> I think the OO way to do this is to provide a method on A that does the
> right thing:
>
> def Bfoo_func(self):
> self.B.foo_func(self)
>
> Or maybe you could look at generic methods, which provide a way
> to do multiple dispatch.
+1
Whic
Reckoner wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
>> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>>
>> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>>
>> A.B.foo()
>>
>> the problem is that some functions inside of B actually need A
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:53:55 -0700, Reckoner wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>
> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>
> A.B.foo()
>
> the problem is that some functi
On Apr 6, 10:53 am, Reckoner wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>
> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>
> A.B.foo()
>
> the problem is that some functions inside of B actu
Reckoner wrote:
hi,
I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
A contains B as a property, so I often do
A.B.foo()
the problem is that some functions inside of B actually need A
(remember I said they w
Reckoner wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>
> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>
> A.B.foo()
>
> the problem is that some functions inside of B actually need A
> (
On Apr 6, 9:53 am, Reckoner wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>
> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>
> A.B.foo()
>
> the problem is that some functions inside of B actua
Reckoner wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
> are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
>
> A contains B as a property, so I often do
>
> A.B.foo()
>
> the problem is that some functions inside of B actually need A
> (r
hi,
I have the following problem: I have two objects, say, A and B, which
are both legitimate stand-alone objects with lives of their own.
A contains B as a property, so I often do
A.B.foo()
the problem is that some functions inside of B actually need A
(remember I said they were both standalon
