Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:55:47 -1000, Jon Van DeVries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
** All the posts found in google are old. I'm assuming new improvements
have been made to both IDEs. **
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm a
Dennis Lee Bieber a écrit :
Not enough experience here... I do know I never liked applications
targeted to the Gnome look, preferring KDE... So... which toolkit did
those desktops favor?
wxWidgets, as I recall, is supposed to attempt to look native on
each OS.
Well, wxWidgets
** All the posts found in google are old. I'm assuming new improvements have
been made to both IDEs. **
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm a newbie.
1. Which one of them requires fewer lines to accomplish the same thing?
from what I understand QT it's just like Borland J-Builder. Meaning, you
On Sunday 18 March 2007 9:55 pm, Jon Van DeVries wrote:
** All the posts found in google are old. I'm assuming new improvements
have been made to both IDEs. **
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm a newbie.
1. Which one of them requires fewer lines to accomplish the same thing?
from what I
Il Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:55:47 -1000, Jon Van DeVries ha scritto:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm a newbie.
Please understand then, that both QT and GTK+ are graphic toolkits. An IDE
is a totally different thing.
Also, please understand that Qt3 and Qt4 exist, and they're quite different
