On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Westley Martínez wrote:
> This is really what I love and hate about the internet. It's full of
> people who argue for the sake of venting their internal frustrations.
> How many discussions comparing declarative and imperative programming
> languages have you seen
On Sep 14, 4:58 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> memilanuk wrote:
> > On 09/14/2011 05:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
> >> even stuff like Ranting Rick posts can be of some amusement when it's
> >> a slow day...
>
> > I subscrib
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:58:32AM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> memilanuk wrote:
>
> > On 09/14/2011 05:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
> >> even stuff like Ranting Rick posts can be of some amusement when it's
> >> a slow
memilanuk wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 05:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
>> even stuff like Ranting Rick posts can be of some amusement when it's
>> a slow day...
>
> I subscribe to the list via Gmane, and if 'most of the spam' get
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:05:23 +0100, memilanuk wrote:
Rick & Xang Li are two examples of what you *don't* see (or at least I
don't) @ SO
Then you haven't been looking hard enough ;-)
--
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:05:23AM -0700, memilanuk wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 05:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
> >even stuff like Ranting Rick posts can be of some amusement when it's
> >a slow day...
>
> I subscribe to the list
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:47:15PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:33 PM, memilanuk wrote:
> > Not saying one is necessarily better than the other, but just subscribing to
> > the feed for the [python] tag on SO has a pretty good SNR...
>
> The SNR here isn't bad either.
On 14/09/11 21:00, Duncan Booth wrote:
> Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> In article ,
>> Duncan Booth wrote:
>>
>>> If you want an answer to how to get a specific bit of code to work then
>>> Stackoverflow is better if only because people can see who has already
>>> answered so don't need to waste time
Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Duncan Booth wrote:
>
>> If you want an answer to how to get a specific bit of code to work then
>> Stackoverflow is better if only because people can see who has already
>> answered so don't need to waste time re-answering every trivial little
>> question
In article ,
Duncan Booth wrote:
> If you want an answer to how to get a specific bit of code to work then
> Stackoverflow is better if only because people can see who has already
> answered so don't need to waste time re-answering every trivial little
> question about syntax.
Any halfway de
On 2011-09-14 15:05, memilanuk wrote:
Rick & Xang Li are two examples of what you *don't* see (or at least I
don't) @ SO
I knew Xang's name would come up. :-) Epic.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 09/14/2011 05:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
even stuff like Ranting Rick posts can be of some amusement when it's
a slow day...
I subscribe to the list via Gmane, and if 'most of the spam' gets
filtered out, I'd hate to s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:33 PM, memilanuk wrote:
> Not saying one is necessarily better than the other, but just subscribing to
> the feed for the [python] tag on SO has a pretty good SNR...
The SNR here isn't bad either. Most of the spam gets filtered out, and
even stuff like Ranting Rick post
On 09/13/2011 09:12 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Matt Joiner, 14.09.2011 04:23:
i'm curious as to what can be done with (and handled better) by
adjusting sys.setswitchinterval
i've opened a question on SO for this, that people might find of
interest: http://stackoverflow.com[...]
I wonder why peop
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Matt Joiner, 14.09.2011 04:23:
>> i'm curious as to what can be done with (and handled better) by
>> adjusting sys.setswitchinterval
>> i've opened a question on SO for this, that people might find of
>> interest: http://stackoverflow.com[...]
>
> I wonder why people ask t
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:12 pm Stefan Behnel wrote:
Matt Joiner, 14.09.2011 04:23:
i'm curious as to what can be done with (and handled better) by
adjusting sys.setswitchinterval
i've opened a question on SO for this, that people might find of
interest: http://stackoverflo
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:12 pm Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Matt Joiner, 14.09.2011 04:23:
>> i'm curious as to what can be done with (and handled better) by
>> adjusting sys.setswitchinterval
>> i've opened a question on SO for this, that people might find of
>> interest: http://stackoverflow.com[...]
>
Matt Joiner, 14.09.2011 04:23:
i'm curious as to what can be done with (and handled better) by
adjusting sys.setswitchinterval
i've opened a question on SO for this, that people might find of
interest: http://stackoverflow.com[...]
I wonder why people ask this kind of question on stackoverflow,
18 matches
Mail list logo
