ssecorp wrote:
def append(self, item):
self.stack.append(item)
I can get to see the stack with var.stack but then why even implement
append when I could do self.stack.append(x) etc.
That way you could do away with OO completely.
Umm. Even if you were to write that, self and stack
On Jul 13, 12:32 am, ssecorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I first learned about OO from Java.
>
> I much prefer to program in Python though.
>
> However I am consufed about 2 things.
>
> 1. Why do I have to pass self into every method in a class? Since I am
> always doing why cant this be automated
On Jul 12, 8:44 pm, castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 1:01 pm, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ssecorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1. Why do I have to pass self into every method in a class? Since I am
> > > always doing why cant this be automated or abstract
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sadly a lot of Java programmers mistake the limitations of their language
> for rules of OO programming, and worse this has spread from Java into other
> languages where these restrictions no longer need apply.
You can g
On Jul 12, 1:01 pm, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ssecorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. Why do I have to pass self into every method in a class? Since I am
> > always doing why cant this be automated or abstracted away?
> > Are the instances where I won't pass self?
> > I imagine th
On 12 juil, 18:32, ssecorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I first learned about OO from Java.
>
> I much prefer to program in Python though.
>
> However I am consufed about 2 things.
>
> 1. Why do I have to pass self into every method in a class?
You mean "declare self as the first argument", I assu
ssecorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Why do I have to pass self into every method in a class? Since I am
> always doing why cant this be automated or abstracted away?
> Are the instances where I won't pass self?
> I imagine there is some tradeoff involved otherwise it would have been
> done awa
On Jul 12, 12:32 pm, ssecorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I first learned about OO from Java.
>
> I much prefer to program in Python though.
>
> However I am consufed about 2 things.
Short answer is, "Java isn't the only way OOP."
Longer answers follow.
> 1. Why do I have to pass self into ever
I first learned about OO from Java.
I much prefer to program in Python though.
However I am consufed about 2 things.
1. Why do I have to pass self into every method in a class? Since I am
always doing why cant this be automated or abstracted away?
Are the instances where I won't pass self?
I ima
