Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:25:20 +0200
with message-id <20130420102520.4928.13148@mithrandir>
and subject line Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#699147: Please package newer
upstream version
has caused the Debian Bug report #699147,
regarding Please package newer upstream version
to be mar
Hi,
There is a previous wnpp bug with this package name (#694731), but it's
not the same package. One of the two names should be changed.
Could you change this package name or contact #694731 submitter and
decide what names are the best for these two packages?
Thanks for your work!
signature.
Quoting Alastair Porter (2013-04-17 13:56:27)
> I have one question about adding documentation to the package. Is it
> easier for you as a packager to have documentation sources, or the
> compiled html, or does it not matter? I'm not too sure what the best
> practises are around this.
As upstre
Hi,
We have just launched a site to help existing open source projects
with funding (www.catincan.com). Our goal is to help more open source
projects become self-sustaining and competitive with propriety
solutions. We're hoping you might provide us with some insight by
answering the 3 questions be
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:55:24 +
Source: python-statsd
Binary: python-statsd
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Antoine Muss
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:40:58 +
Source: voluptuous
Binary: python-voluptuous
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Antoine Mus
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2013-04-17 15:57:18)
> Quoting Alastair Porter (2013-04-17 13:56:27)
> > I have one question about adding documentation to the package. Is it
> > easier for you as a packager to have documentation sources, or the
> > compiled html, or does it not matter? I'm not too sure
Simon,
Thanks for the email. I'm taking a look at these build things this week and
will hopefully get a new release out soon.
I have one question about adding documentation to the package. Is it easier
for you as a packager to have documentation sources, or the compiled html,
or does it not matter?
On 2013-04-20 12:42, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> There is a previous wnpp bug with this package name (#694731), but it's
> not the same package. One of the two names should be changed.
Many thanks for being so attentive! I will use the upstream name pyscss
for this package to prevent the confl
9 matches
Mail list logo
