Re: [Python-modules-team] musicbrainzngs package in debian (re: bug #698202)

2013-04-20 Thread Alastair Porter
Simon, Thanks for the email. I'm taking a look at these build things this week and will hopefully get a new release out soon. I have one question about adding documentation to the package. Is it easier for you as a packager to have documentation sources, or the compiled html, or does it not matter?

Re: [Python-modules-team] musicbrainzngs package in debian (re: bug #698202)

2013-04-20 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2013-04-17 15:57:18) > Quoting Alastair Porter (2013-04-17 13:56:27) > > I have one question about adding documentation to the package. Is it > > easier for you as a packager to have documentation sources, or the > > compiled html, or does it not matter? I'm not too sure

Re: [Python-modules-team] musicbrainzngs package in debian (re: bug #698202)

2013-04-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Alastair Porter (2013-04-17 13:56:27) > I have one question about adding documentation to the package. Is it > easier for you as a packager to have documentation sources, or the > compiled html, or does it not matter? I'm not too sure what the best > practises are around this. As upstre

Re: [Python-modules-team] musicbrainzngs package in debian (re: bug #698202)

2013-04-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Alistair, Quoting Alastair Porter (2013-03-12 15:46:30) > I'm the developer of the python-musicbrainzngs library. I see you > recently closed a bug on the package > (]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698202). I'm not > sure if you did this as the package maintainer or just to