Hi
Question
I have isapi filter and I want to added to W3SVC, can you send me same
example for this
Thank you
___
python-win32 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
On 3/11/2009 9:03 PM, Celvin wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently using win32com to access COM objects created via .NET's
COM interop, which is working surprisingly well.
Currently, I stumpled upon a minor problem, though: I would like to
connect a class implementing several event handlers to an COM objec
On 4/11/2009 5:13 AM, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Aahz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
When I run the following code in linux all goes well. But when I try
in win32 I get a pickle error saying it cant pickle None Type when I
start the proces
On 3/11/2009 5:41 PM, Samuel Lerner wrote:
Hi
Question
I have isapi filter and I want to added to W3SVC, can you send me same
example for this
I'm afraid I don't understand the question - have you found the samples
in the isapi\samples directory?
Also, please see the isapi_wsgi-...@googleg
Aahz:
Thank you.
The correction has been made in the source for the second edition.
(Now I need to finish writing the *proposal* for the second edition so we
can see if O'Reilly will print one.)
--
Vernon Cole
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Aahz wrote:
> The signature for win32evtlogutil.AddSo
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
>
> I'd try running it from python.exe to see if it is something funky about the
> pythonwin execution environment...
>
Same result, cant pickle NoneType when I call start() on the process
object, exact same code works with out error on linux
On 5/11/2009 4:57 AM, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
I'd try running it from python.exe to see if it is something funky about the
pythonwin execution environment...
Same result, cant pickle NoneType when I call start() on the process
object,
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 5/11/2009 4:57 AM, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
> In that case you probably need to reduce your sample to the smallest
> possible code which demonstrates the problem.
>
> (At face value, it almost looks like you have 2 discrete interpreters in
