On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> I think the only things missing from my branch currently are:
>
> 1) 10.3.9 support
I believe this is taken care of now that Ronald contributed the weak
linking patch.
> 2) Universal PythonLauncher
This is done.
> 3) Revamped Mac/OSX/Dist s
On 5-feb-2006, at 4:57, Bob Ippolito wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@
ifneq ($(CONFIGURE_MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET),"")
SHELL=/usr/bin/env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=$
(CONFIGURE_MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET) /bin/sh
endif
That will work, but if we're going to use GNU-ism's in the makefile
I'd rat
On Feb 4, 2006, at 2:57 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 4-feb-2006, at 11:16, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2006, at 1:29 AM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
An alternative to fat might be 'ppc,i386'. That is longer, but
On Feb 4, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 4-feb-2006, at 21:26, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4-feb-2006, at 21:02, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>>
>>> What I don't quite understand is that the latter patch doesn't
>>> quite work: the i386 contains weak links to fstatvfs and othe
On Feb 4, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 4-feb-2006, at 21:02, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>
>> What I don't quite understand is that the latter patch doesn't
>> quite work: the i386 contains weak links to fstatvfs and other
>> 10.4-only symbols, but the ppc version does not. A
On 4-feb-2006, at 21:26, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 4-feb-2006, at 21:02, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
What I don't quite understand is that the latter patch doesn't
quite work: the i386 contains weak links to fstatvfs and other
10.4-only symbols, but the ppc version does not. A small test
pr
On 4-feb-2006, at 21:02, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
What I don't quite understand is that the latter patch doesn't
quite work: the i386 contains weak links to fstatvfs and other 10.4-
only symbols, but the ppc version does not. A small test program
does work correctly.
I hope nobody noticed
test_email is failing, this is due to a bad checkin: the files in Lib/
test/data should be checked in as binary files and are not
The attached python2.4-readline-searchpath.patch makes sure we pick
up libreadline.a from LDFLAGS in preference of the system
libreadline.dylib
The attached
On 4-feb-2006, at 11:16, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 4, 2006, at 1:29 AM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
An alternative to fat might be 'ppc,i386'. That is longer, but is
clearer about which architectures are supported (just in case
s
On Feb 4, 2006, at 1:29 AM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> An alternative to fat might be 'ppc,i386'. That is longer, but is
>> clearer about which architectures are supported (just in case someone
>> decides to donate support for a thr
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> An alternative to fat might be 'ppc,i386'. That is longer, but is
> clearer about which architectures are supported (just in case someone
> decides to donate support for a threeway universal build). Patching
> setuptools to kn
On 4-feb-2006, at 3:02, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Feb 3, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Bill Northcott wrote:
On 04/02/2006, at 12:00 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
The issue only arises using Python 2.4.x on Tiger. It does not
arise
with Python 2.3.x on Tiger or Python 2.4.x on Panther (MacOS
10.3.
On 4-feb-2006, at 1:54, Bob Ippolito wrote:
The bin directory inside the framework is a bit to hidden for
most users
and hard to get to using the Finder.
Maybe we could put a link from /Library/Python/2.x/bin to the bin
directory in the Framework. That way, you wouldn't need to change the
On 4-feb-2006, at 1:21, Christopher Barker wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Even more important that versioning is that eggs give you an easy way
to uninstall software (although I'm not quite sure about scripts).
It really does look like eggs are the way of the future.
Bob's "official unoffici
On 3-feb-2006, at 21:10, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 3-feb-2006, at 20:00, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 3-feb-2006, at 5:23, Bob Ippolito wr
On 3-feb-2006, at 20:51, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Since this is GCC, the #ifndef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ branch is always
false... so I'm making this a compile-time not configure-time
value, but I left in the configure-time stuff for other platforms.
Did you test this? I'd be surprised if distutils
16 matches
Mail list logo
