It really has nothing to do with Xcode (or even GCC). This is all autoconf, but I'm pretty sure it was just that Ronald had an OPT environment variable set when he built it because I can't reproduce.-bobOn Apr 6, 2006, at 10:38 PM, Paul Berkowitz wrote: Maybe someone should ask on the Xcode mailin
Title: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] 2.4.3 Python Universal Binary Pystone Comparison
Maybe someone should ask on the Xcode mailing list. Almost every question is being answered there by the lead Xcode Tools Apple engineer, Chris Espinosa.
--
Paul Berkowitz
From: Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
I can't reproduce this when I configure from the universal trunk, maybe Ronald had an OPT environment variable set when he built it?-bobOn Apr 6, 2006, at 10:34 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:Ok, I see what the problem is, because the Universal python is also half as fast on my PPC.It appears that the univ
Ok, I see what the problem is, because the Universal python is also half as fast on my PPC.It appears that the universal build is not using any compiler optimizations at all, where a normal build is -O3. I'm not quite sure where/why this is happening (autoconf is evil), but I'm sure someone will f
On Apr 6, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering about comparative performance -- shouldn't a Macbook
>> Pro 2.0 GHz be VASTLY faster than a humble iBook G4 12" (1.33 GHz PPC
>> G4)?
>>
>> And yet, pybench 1.0 tells me: 7806 ms
I just realized that I only sent this to Shane, so for the whole list (and Alex)Hmm. Here's three of those...[sprout:2065]> ./python.exe -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()"(1.22, 40983.606557377047)=== 2006-04-06 18:0
On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Alex Martelli wrote:
> I'm wondering about comparative performance -- shouldn't a Macbook
> Pro 2.0 GHz be VASTLY faster than a humble iBook G4 12" (1.33 GHz PPC
> G4)?
>
> And yet, pybench 1.0 tells me: 7806 ms on the iBook, 7721 on the
> Macbook; also, the iBook measu
I'm wondering about comparative performance -- shouldn't a Macbook
Pro 2.0 GHz be VASTLY faster than a humble iBook G4 12" (1.33 GHz PPC
G4)?
And yet, pybench 1.0 tells me: 7806 ms on the iBook, 7721 on the
Macbook; also, the iBook measures at 22026 pystones/sec, the Macbook
at 22624. Tha
On Apr 6, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Stefan Werner wrote:
> when trying to link my application against the universal binary build
> linked from Python.org, I get an error about these undefined symbols:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
> _fstatvfs referenced from Python expected to be defined in libSyst
Hi,
when trying to link my application against the universal binary build
linked from Python.org, I get an error about these undefined symbols:
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_fstatvfs referenced from Python expected to be defined in libSystem
_lchown referenced from Python expected to be define
Just for fun I got the svn source and compiled it on my 1.8Ghz Dual G5 running 10.4.6 to add a data point:daniello ~/WIP/Python-Builds/py-24 ./python.exe -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()"(1.6199, 30864.1975308642)Better than the 1.86 GHZ MacBookPro but surprisingl
Still getting this with Mac OS X Intel, using Ronald's new 2.4.3
Universal Python and Bob's recent py2app work (pulled in with trunk
of PyObjC).
It will now at least get NSUserDefaults.SharedDefaults(), but dies
trying to get the persistent domain. I've uploaded a new
TestUserDefaults.zip
Nice. Very jealous about the Intel MacBook Pros. :) You both better put them to good use! ;)Have either of you tried building the 2.4 release branch and running pystones from it?For those reading who may not know how from Terminal::svn co http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release24
And here is mine on a 1.83GHz 17" Intel iMac:$ python -VPython 2.4.3$ python -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()"(1.99, 25125.628140703517)-Jordan ManthaOn Apr 6, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Ted Leung wrote:FWIW here are 3 runs from 1.83GHz MacBook Pro[sprout:2132]> /Library/Framework
FWIW here are 3 runs from 1.83GHz MacBook Pro[sprout:2132]> /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/bin/python -c "from test.pystone import pystones; print pystones()"(2.0405, 24509.803921568622)=== 2006-04-06 14:
I was just wondering if anyone else had compared pystones on their box? I downloaded the latest Universal Build from the python.org and found things to be a bit sluggish. So I ran the pystones test to quickly gauge things, and noticed that things are indeed running about 1/3 of what they should b
[Ronald Oussoren wrote]
> > Ronald, you mentioned a while back that you intended to integrate
> > that work with the main Python SVN. Is that still your intention?
>
> Yes it is, but only for the trunk.
Cool, thanks.
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 6-apr-2006, at 18:46, Trent Mick wrote:
>
> Ronald, you mentioned a while back that you intended to integrate
> that work
> with the main Python SVN. Is that still your intention?
Yes it is, but only for the trunk.
Ronald
___
Pythonmac-SIG mailli
I'm happy to announce that ActivePython 2.4.3.11 is now available from:
http://www.ActiveState.com/Products/ActivePython/
This release is a maintenance/update release for existing platforms.
See the announcement on python-announce for full details.
Currently ActivePython provides separate Int
19 matches
Mail list logo
