On 25-apr-2006, at 1:53, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Chris, Kevin, and Bob. Yes, I should have changed the
>> thread name. I stayed with it because it's where Kevin posted the
>> good news about wxPython.
>>
>
> Well no kidding. I do
Hi.
> p.s. how do people like the new logo over in pythonmac land?
It's okay, but our version[1, 2] is shinier. ;)
[1]: http://hcs.harvard.edu/~jrus/python/python-logo-glassy.png
[2]: http://hcs.harvard.edu/~jrus/python/prettified-py-icons.png
> The standard contribution form filled out by the
On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:14, Christopher Barker wrote:
> My primary comment is that you're discussing building a Universal
> package, but keeping the external libs installed with the standard
> "make
> install". I haven't tried your scheme yet, but usually that results in
> dynamic libs being bui
I forgot to mention one important fact: the test.py included in
pycrypto ran fine, and raised no errors, when I ran it immediately
following the build/install efforts.
On Apr 24, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Yesterday I attempted to install the pycrypto package. "setup.py
> build"
Yesterday I attempted to install the pycrypto package. "setup.py
build" invoked gcc, which threw a huge number of errors on
signedness. As it was taco time, I left for the day.
Today, I read through some lists and the "signedness" errors for gcc
v4 sounded benign so I ran the build again. Th
> Well no kidding. I don't personally have access to the python.org
> server and neither does Ronald. I don't think either of us asked for
> it to be posted there, it wasn't ready at the time. I'm not sure
> who's supposed to fix it either.
I do. I'll see what can be done. I favor takin
On Apr 24, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Chris, Kevin, and Bob. Yes, I should have changed the
>> thread name. I stayed with it because it's where Kevin posted the
>> good news about wxPython.
>>
>> Maybe I'm missi
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
> Thanks to Chris, Kevin, and Bob. Yes, I should have changed the
> thread name. I stayed with it because it's where Kevin posted the
> good news about wxPython.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't it awfully silly to have
> these c
Thanks to Chris, Kevin, and Bob. Yes, I should have changed the
thread name. I stayed with it because it's where Kevin posted the
good news about wxPython.
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't it awfully silly to have these
competing versions around, with names and apparent pedigrees simil
On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> Charles Hartman wrote:
>>> I did the "obvious":
>>> sudo mv /usr/local/lib/wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2rc1 /usr/local/
>>> lib/ wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2
>>> and it seems to work. Di
Charles Hartman wrote:
> I assumed I was getting Ronald's build.
> Is it ActiveState's???
The title of this thread is
"""Installing wxPython with ActivePython and OSX"""
ActivePython is ActiveState's Python, which is why I thought you were
using it.
Perhaps it's only the thread title that's
Hi Charles,
On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> Charles Hartman wrote:
>>> I did the "obvious":
>>> sudo mv /usr/local/lib/wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2rc1 /usr/local/
>>> lib/ wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2
>>> and it seems
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Charles Hartman wrote:
>> I did the "obvious":
>> sudo mv /usr/local/lib/wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2rc1 /usr/local/
>> lib/ wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2
>> and it seems to work. Did I create havoc somewhere else?
>
> probably not, but in gen
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> I'm entertaining the thought of dropping BuildApplet. But as it solves a
> real need I might improve it instead (mostly testing and better
> documentation).
I also think it solves a real need. But I'd probably rather see it based
on the Py2App code. I don't know that co
Charles Hartman wrote:
> I did the "obvious":
> sudo mv /usr/local/lib/wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2rc1 /usr/local/lib/
> wxPython-unicode-2.6.3.2
> and it seems to work. Did I create havoc somewhere else?
probably not, but in general, you should use a sym link, rather than a
re-name:
sudo ln
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
> import wx
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>File "", line 1, in ?
>>File "//Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/
>> python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.6-mac
On Apr 24, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>> Technically the current name is py2applet, but it has the standalone
>> app behavior.
>
> So Py2applet is just a new name for Py2app? Why the name change? I
> kind
> of liked the App vs. Applet Distinction, and wo
On 24-apr-2006, at 20:31, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Along with the icon discussion (they look great, by the way) There has
> been a lot of mention of BuildApplet and Py2Applet, etc. I'm a bit
> confused as to what actually exists. This is my understanding --
> someone
> please cla
On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
import wx
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "", line 1, in ?
>File "//Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/
> python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.6-mac-unicode/wx/__init__.py", line 42,
> in ?
> from wx._core
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Technically the current name is py2applet, but it has the standalone
> app behavior.
So Py2applet is just a new name for Py2app? Why the name change? I kind
of liked the App vs. Applet Distinction, and would like to have a way to
do either.
> I'd like to slap a GUI on
Excellent!
Problem, though -- a bone-dumb one, I'm quite sure, but I'm living
proof that the unsavvy can run into it:
On my Intel iMac I downloaded and installed
1. the Universal-MacPython-2.4.3.dmg (it made a new Applications/
MacPython 2.4
folder, beside my existing A
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:34:56AM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> SPE Stani's Python Editor wrote:
> > One more question which which versions of python and wxPython ship OS
> > X 10.2, 10.3 and any version which is still common? (For 10.4 it is
> > python2.3.5 and wxPython2.5.3.1 (check with im
Kevin Ollivier wrote:
> Hi Trent, Bob, etc.
>
> Sorry for the late reply. It's been a busy week. I've altered
> wxPython's downloads page to hopefully be clearer and more up-to-
> date. As for the ANSI/Unicode issue, I made Unicode a little more
> prominent but ANSI still gets quite a lot of d
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>+1, I like it!
>
>Same here. Let's stop here.
Agree. Great work. Time to hit the presses. :)
has
--
http://freespace.virgin.net/hamish.sanderson/
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/m
Hi Trent, Bob, etc.
Sorry for the late reply. It's been a busy week. I've altered
wxPython's downloads page to hopefully be clearer and more up-to-
date. As for the ANSI/Unicode issue, I made Unicode a little more
prominent but ANSI still gets quite a lot of downloads, so I'm
hesitant to ma
On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Along with the icon discussion (they look great, by the way) There has
> been a lot of mention of BuildApplet and Py2Applet, etc. I'm a bit
> confused as to what actually exists. This is my understanding --
> someone
> please
SPE Stani's Python Editor wrote:
> One more question which which versions of python and wxPython ship OS
> X 10.2, 10.3 and any version which is still common? (For 10.4 it is
> python2.3.5 and wxPython2.5.3.1 (check with import wx;wx.VERSION).
| Python | wxPython
10.2 2.2.?
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Gore wrote:
>
>>I use the old Numeric package quite a bit (numpy is just not ready
>>for primetime) and stupid me, I didn't check if it was available
>>before I installed the Universal binary package for python 2.4.3.
>>Rather than moving b
Hi all,
Along with the icon discussion (they look great, by the way) There has
been a lot of mention of BuildApplet and Py2Applet, etc. I'm a bit
confused as to what actually exists. This is my understanding -- someone
please clarify if I'm wrong:
BuildApplication: Builds a complete *.app bun
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Gore wrote:
>> I use the old Numeric package quite a bit (numpy is just not ready
>> for primetime) and stupid me, I didn't check if it was available
>> before I installed the Universal binary package for python 2.4.3.
>> Rather than moving
Daniel Lord wrote:
> I made good on my threat and wrote it up.
Thanks for writing this up.
Maybe it should be part of:
http://pythonmac.org/wiki/UniversalPackages
or at least linked there.
> please review my content and let's get anything
> incorrect fixed.
For now, I've just fixed a couple
On Apr 23, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Gore wrote:
> I use the old Numeric package quite a bit (numpy is just not ready
> for primetime) and stupid me, I didn't check if it was available
> before I installed the Universal binary package for python 2.4.3.
> Rather than moving backwards, I'd like to t
I use the old Numeric package quite a bit (numpy is just not ready
for primetime) and stupid me, I didn't check if it was available
before I installed the Universal binary package for python 2.4.3.
Rather than moving backwards, I'd like to try getting it to compile.
However, I can't seem
kevin parks wrote:
> The world isn't gonna end but i am still 100% -0 on this proposal...
It won't kill me either, but FWIW:
-1
I guess that's what I get for being more a *nix guy than a Mac Guy.
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
It's amazing what a nice, shiny, new icon can do for morale. I'm
breathing better already. (And I'm not even being ironic.) That's a
sixteen-ton weight off my chest.
Charles Hartman
On Apr 24, 2006, at 1:18 AM, Jacob Rus wrote:
> Zachery Bir wrote:
>> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>> +1, I like it!
On 24-apr-2006, at 3:37, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2006, at 5:20 PM, Jacob Rus wrote:
>
>> Donovan Preston wrote:
>>> What about something more like the Help Indexer in /Developer/
>>> Applications/Utilities. A little more stylized and less
>>> photorealistic. Should look better at small
On 4/23/06, Jacob Rus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zachery Bir wrote:
> > Bob Ippolito wrote:
> >> +1, I like it!
> > Moi, aussi. Put a fork in it, it's done!
> Ok, the fork is in.
>
> http://hcs.harvard.edu/~jrus/python/python-icons.zip
>
> P.S. two of the icons have drop states.
>
> _
On Apr 24, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 24, 2006, at 04:37PM, William Kyngesburye
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I just noticed a small issue with the new universal installer. It
>> adds a path to the python bin folder to the user's ~/.profile.
>>
>> 1. The
I just noticed a small issue with the new universal installer. It
adds a path to the python bin folder to the user's ~/.profile.
1. The Apple-default bash shell doesn't read .profile (doesn't for
me). (I think tcsh does, but I always used .login back then)
2. If it doesn't exist, .profile ge
39 matches
Mail list logo
